Comment Re:But they weren't (Score 1) 235
Actually they ended up with a lot more money, per my reading (I'm no economist though). From the paper: "The transfer caused total individual income to fall by about $1,500/year relative to the control group, excluding the transfers." Including the transfers ($1000/mo or $12k/yr) means individual incomes rose by $10,500/yr. Given that, it's no surprise they were not as hard pressed and were able to work less and have more leisure time.
Also I see no mention of "quality of life" or "happiness" in either the surveys nor the mobile app data.
"These surveys included questions on time use with different lookback periods as a complement to mobile app-based time diaries, as well as questions on job search, quality of employment, job satisfaction, hours worked, income changes, intrahousehold employment outcomes, housing search and mobility, and participation in formal and informal education and training, among other outcomes"
"the [mobile] app provides a user friendly calendar interface that allows respondents to report all of their activities in a 24-hour period by dragging activities into time slots."