Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Chip prices could also go up (Score 1) 36

Intel could go into being a foundary only company, and make CPUs, GPUs and NPUs for everybody, be it Apple, Microsoft, Qualcomm, NVIDIA, AMD,.... There is now little value in the x86 IP, particularly when ARM has replaced it throughout Apple's lineup, a good bit of ChromeOS laptops and even Microsoft is making an effort there w/ their Surface books. If I were Intel, just dump all the x86 IP to AMD and NVIDIA (rake in as much cash that way) and focus just on the latest fabs. They were leaders at one time: time to get back to it by making everything for everyone

Comment Re:To All the AI Haters Out There (Score 1) 36

The only original shit they're doing is more AI. Which I personally don't care for. If my phone does what I need it to do - phone calls, video calls, scanning QR codes and accessing websites,... that's good enough for me. Unlike most millennials and zoomers, I don't stay stuck on my phone whenever I'm alone

Comment Re:To All the AI Haters Out There (Score 1) 36

I'm not an AI hater per se, but I generally avoid enabling AI, or buying toys whose only selling point is AI. With that in mind, I avoided higher end Google Pixels or ARM based Windows PCs (which aren't compatible w/ legacy software or devices that can only connect to Wintel boxes) or anything that only screams AI and nothing else. AI has its limitations, as one can see if one probes much into querying it on questions, and people who use it to substitute their own thinking are asking to be badly disappointed As for the shortages, that's a cyclical thing. Memory becomes expensive, then manufacturers make more of it to rake in the numbers, which creates a glut in the market, that causes memory prices to fall, which causes manufacturers to cut down production, which in turn increases prices, lather, rinse, repeat. Same goes for SSDs, GPUs, NPUs.... Don't read too much into the current shortages: memory will become cheap again

Comment Re:Attempted totalitarian idiocy (Score 1) 15

Actually, no. Since 2021, the Indian government has been very week and bends very easily w/ not just public protests, but also foreign influences. Whether it was redacting their farm bill after protests from just one state (Punjab) to ending their attacks on Pakistan this year when Trump threatened tariffs (which are still on, so India had no good reason to stop its bombing) to pulling an order in Delhi that cars older than 10 years had to b put off the roads, regardless of their working conditions or emissions status Modi barely won an election last year, and is actually in a coalition government. If his relations w/ his coalition partners sours, that could be the end of his government

Comment Re:Afrinic? That's a word that doesn't make sense. (Score 1) 53

No, that's how the RIRs are usually named: APNIC - Asia-Pacific NIC AfriNIC - Africa NIC LATNIC - LATin America NIC ARIN and RIPE NCC are the exceptions. ARIN is American Registry of Internet Numbers, but "America" here covers the US, Canada, and all of the Caribbean (including Latin American island countries like Cuba, Dominican Republic, Haiti,...) RIPE NCC stands for Réseaux IP Européens Network Coordination Centre and covers Europe, West Asia and Central Asia I would have split it differently. Put Russia and Central Asian countries as well as Armenia in APNIC, every country from Pakistan and West to AfriNIC (except Israel, put them in APNIC) and all of Europe from Ukraine/Belarus/Georgia to RIPE NCC. Similarly, in the Americas, put Cuba and other Spanish/French speaking islands in LATNIC, while countries like Guyana, Belize, Suriname,... would have fallen under ARIN

Comment Re:Other unused blocks (Score 1) 53

Most of the original legacy owners, such as DEC, have let go of theirs: now, you see it w/ the Googles and the Cloudflares. But nobody should release IPv4 addresses if they no longer need them: just go dual stack. That would force newer entities going online to for IPv6-only, w/ transition mechanisms to connect to IPv4-only clients or sites

Comment IPv6 status right now (Score 1) 53

At the moment, IPv6 is just short of the 50% mark when it comes to most internet traffic. LTE, 5G, DOCSYS, Starlink,... all explicitly call for IPv6. So that's what their gear uses. As for the clients, if they are cellphones and connected to these services, they automatically use IPv6. They'd only use IPv4 if connected to an access point configured for only IPv4 As for computers, one can enable IPv6 in settings, and be off to the races, if the gateway they're connected to has IPv6 enabled. Not sure how many are, though

Comment Tunneling or native? (Score 1) 53

LTE, 5G, DOCSYS 3.0 and after, all define IPv6 in their spec. In other words, they may or may not support IPv4, but they have to support IPv6 in order to be compliant The backbones are now largely IPv6. If they're using transition mechanisms like xLAT464, then they definitely aren't tunneling, since they're appending 64:ff9b::/96 to the IPv4 address to make it an IPv6 address. Before connecting to the IPv4 gateway, they drop the 64:ff9b::/96 header, so that the host gets the packets to the correct IPv4 addresses My cellphones show IPv6 addresses when I go to the settings page, and am not connected to a WiFi, which may be configured as IPv4 only. As for my laptops, I have consciously configured them to enable IPv6, and so I only get IPv4 there if the gateway it's connecting to doesn't support IPv6

Comment Go dual stack, don't release IPv4 addresses (Score 1) 53

Yeah, I've been doing some digging, and looks like IPv6 is just short of the 50% mark. Hopefully in 2026, it will get there While I am an IPv6 advocate, I'm not an advocate of IPv6-only if one is transitioning from IPv4. That would result in releasing those freed-up IPv4s to the ISPs or RIRs involved, delaying the global move to IPv6. If an entity is on IPv4 and decides to add IPv6, then they should stay dual stack and not release those IPv4 addresses. That would result in newer entities that are just going online being forced to go IPv6-only, w/ transition mechanisms for IPv4 clients

Slashdot Top Deals

Even bytes get lonely for a little bit.

Working...