Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:With the gerrymandering in Texas (Score 0, Troll) 88

Indeed.

As Douglas MacArthur once said, "There is no substitute for victory."

The real solution is for Democrats to start winning elections again.

Unfortunately, that requires Democrats to address the concerns of working-class voters and talk to people in language they understand.

I don't see that happening.

Comment Re:With the gerrymandering in Texas (Score 1) 88

The Dems will have difficulty counter-gerrymandering.

Some states, such as California, have voter-approved non-partisan groups (usually retired judges) do the redistricting. The legislature can't overturn that. It would have to go back to a voter referendum, which is difficult, expensive, and time-consuming.

But a bigger problem is that gerrymandering just doesn't work as well for Democrats. Their voters are more concentrated in urban areas that are easy for Republicans to corral into a few districts, while red voters are spread across broad rural and suburban areas.

Comment Re:It's bad enough people get experimented on (Score 4, Interesting) 34

Self-driving vehicles aren't perfect, but that isn't a reasonable standard.

What matters is that they have a better safety record than human drivers.

These trucks are even safer than other SDVs because they're driving fixed routes that have been mapped, with every sign and marker in the database.

They're also safer than human drivers because they drive slower. Human-driven trucks usually drive the speed limit, which is 75 mph on the Texas portion of I-45. A self-driving truck will go slower to minimize fuel consumption, so 55 mph. A truck going 75 has nearly twice the kinetic energy.

Slashdot Top Deals

"The hands that help are better far than the lips that pray." -- Robert G. Ingersoll

Working...