Comment Git for Papers (Score 0) 60
May be we need something like Git, but for papers, were you publish, add reviewers, mark errors, correct, then is published but not verified, add verifiers, and once verified, mark it as usable.
Might need a way to check if the verifier is trustworthy, like "respect" mark, given only by proven centers (universities/known scholars may be?), similar on how we verify a SSL cert (you need a trust chain back to the root)
If some preceding work became unverified (cause some controversy, proven cheat, etc etc), all of the works on the chain after it became "unproven" and need to be verified again by a trust worthy verifier.