Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Good (Score 3, Insightful) 104

>It's one of the few segments in IT where you're not directly at constant risk of being replaced by an H1B.

Truth. One of the reasons why I keep gravitating back to defense work. Only since around 2004 or so; there's now this "government shutdown" nonsense, which is a bit of a vicious circle, because programs get fucked over, then you have to roll off the contract and find work on another. And sometimes, there isn't any. (happened to me at Lockheed), so some people have to cycle back into the private sector for a few years (which isn't a bad thing; because THAT is where you pick up new skills, to be honest). Then when some asshole "businessman" crashes the business and does layoffs (to replace you with H1B's), you're back on the street again, and you end up back in the "safe" sector: defense. Oh, and if your Clearance expires while you're in the private sector, then the contractor just pays the $10k (or whatever it is now) to re-do your investigation. This has happened to me twice now.

Comment Re:This is why I'm opposed to nuclear. (Score 1) 129

>n that environment, a "safer" reactor just means they can get away with more cost-cutting to line their own pockets. Until we figure out a way to eliminate that, I'm not at all confident that even the most theoretically "idiot proof" reactor would actually be substantially safer in practice than the reactors we have today.

It's really THIS.

And we already have a way to eliminate that. Just not in the Civilian world. As soon as you try to run a nuclear reactor as a for-profit business where the costs are borne by others (like the people who live in the town that gets shut down after the plant explodes; they will not get their land back in their own lifetimes, but shareholders don't give a fuck) - it's a recipie for disaster. But operate a nuclear power plant as part of an Navy vessel; these folks mean business, and they do it right. And it's nowhere near profitable, compared to other means of electrical generation. (this is why the commercial industry is leaving nuclear power: it's not profitable unless the government gives them shitloads of money).

And the prevailing Milton Friedman attitudes of running business and informing Government Policy is what is responsible for the NRC being no longer able to do their jobs.

Comment Re:So, basically (Score 1) 53

Setting aside whether they're justified or unjustified - the sanctions actually worked as intended.

I don't think so.

The sanctions may have hurt Huawei as intended, but every other Asian organization is now looking for independence of any supplier that the US has control over. This means that in the long term more and more Asian organizations will depend on each other for supplies instead of using American suppliers. This can cost the US a lot more than the temporary harm on Huawei.

Comment A solution (Score 1) 76

If they're suffering from problems, they should solve them.

For the corruption, maybe institute an actual justice system that punishes actual corrupt people, taking bribes, or using extortion. Rather than just jailing political opponents.

For the sanctions, they might consider honoring the treaty they signed to not invade or threaten Ukraine, or Crimea.

Things would be going much better for them, and their space program.

Comment Re:Warning: Strong risk of argument from ignorance (Score 2) 122

But it becomes vanishingly unlikely; to produce certain alloys with certain isotope ratios; outside of a clean-room. There is so much environmental contamination from various sources, (including nuclear testing; also nuclear accidents, and also natural volcanism) - that it's almost a science to be able to determine the age some materials were manufactured, purely by analyzing the isotope content).

I think that there tend to be simpler explanations for things like these, and it's not likely what most people think it is, (aliens). But on the other hand, I think it's fascinating, and definitely bears much deeper examination.

Submission + - AmigaOS receives various upgrades

Mike Bouma writes: A-EON Technology Ltd has released Enhancer Software Release 2.1 for AmigaOS4.1 FE update 2, which itself was released on 23 December 2020. It's an OS enhancement package with large amounts of updated and upgraded OS components. Also earlier this year Hyperion released AmigaOS 3.2 for all classic Amigas, here's a roundup of new features by The Guru Meditation on youtube.

Slashdot Top Deals

"We Americans, we're a simple people... but piss us off, and we'll bomb your cities." -- Robin Williams, _Good Morning Vietnam_

Working...