Comment The Atlantic got the headline wrong. (Score 1) 437
It should have been:
Is Petty Theft a Progressive form of Wealth Redistribution?
It should have been:
Is Petty Theft a Progressive form of Wealth Redistribution?
The problem with post-scarcity economies is that they fail to realize that not everything can be "post-scarce." There will always be things that need to be rationed, and there will need be mechanisms to deal with it.
Front row seats to Taylor Swift are scarce. Manhattan and Tahiti beachfront real estate is scarce. Only one person gets to be President. Being the first person to own that new Fendi bag is scarce.
I don't agree with this, principally because it assumes that the People are good legislators. While in general (and in this thread) we concentrate on the electioneering and pandering aspects of politicians, there is another ignored side: they make law. And just as we require high standards for those who represent in the legal system (lawyers) and those who adjudicate the law (judges), we should have high standards for those who make it.
Writing legislation is a skill, and governments benefit when it is done well. Just as you don't want the public voting on how to fly the plane, you don't want them writing legislation.
What we need is a public that can choose good legislators/politicians. And the problem is, they're not very good at it, and elections are not framed in terms of who makes better decisions.
This is one of the things that the judge found, but not the only thing.
The Righthaven suit failed because they are not the copyright holders, non-holders can't sue, and their attempts to arrange otherwise failed.
They are at risk of being sanctioned because they failed to disclose the arrangement between themselves and the copyright holders.
There are states other than California?
Use my current confidence to have sex with all those hot high school girls.
Hackers of the world, unite!