Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Divide and conquer? (Score 1) 98

The US has never hosted weapons in Ukraine.

https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fedition.cnn.com%2F2021%2F1...
December 10, 2021: US small arms and ammo arrive in Ukraine as Pentagon details troops to train country’s military

The US has never even suggested hosting weapons in Ukraine.

They refused to promise not to do it in the future. They also allowed several ex-SU countries to join NATO and are hosting weapons in ex-Warshaw-Pact countries. So, hosting weapons in Ukraine is the next step that Russia could expect.

The US hasn't deployed nuclear weapons to new locations

It's not about nuclear weapons only. Ukraine could attack Crimea with non-nuclear weapons.

But, ever since the Soviet Union has existed, it's been the primary source of instability in the world.

I'm afraid this discussion is getting too wide. I propose to return to Ukraine vs Cuba comparison.

Do you believe the stuff you post

In general, I do.

Comment Re:Divide and conquer? (Score 1) 98

Like Cuba, Ukraine decided to be a threat to their neighbor. Unlike Ukraine, Cuban crisis had been resolved without war because Soviet Union agreed not to host their weapons in Cuba. Unfortunately, US didn't do the same in 2022.

Also don't blame communism or SU for the world instability, please. The world was "unstable" long before SU was created and it is still "unstable" long after SU passed away.

Comment Re:Divide and conquer? (Score 1) 98

1. Ukraine has never had nuclear weapons under their control. Some bombs/warheads were stored there but they were unusable without secret codes controlled by Moscow.
2. There are lots of claims to Ukraine from both Russia and China. One of them is that Ukraine was unlawfully consuming Russian natural gas. Another is Motor Sich company that was bought by China and then nationalized by Ukraine.
3. Unlike Ukraine, problem of Soviet nuclear weapons in Cuba was resolved without war after Soviet Union agreed not to install their nuclear weapons there.

Comment JFYI (Score 1) 77

"Ultra-fast" means, according to the article, 350 kW. All these 400 chargers will be able to give 140 MW of electricity. Caloric value of gasoline is about 45 MJ/kg. So, all this power is comparable with 5 liters of gasoline per second. Standard fuel pumps are able to give 50 l/min. So, all these "400 ultra-fast chargers" are equal to 6 standard fuel pumps or one small gas station.

Comment Re:eh (Score 1) 142

In 30 years, how many times did you start a new C project from scratch? If never, it's not a surprise you didn't have to reimplement everything because other people already did it for you.

Comment Re:Stupid Russians (Score 1) 150

Big as it is the Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant (6 Gw) it is a rounding error compared to the total installed EU capacity (around 1 Tw).

From 962 GW of the EU installed capacity, 388 GW are "combustible fuels" that suffer from the high fuel prices and lack of gas. Another 176+138=314 GW are wind+solar that can't work 24/7 (and you can't control it). Another 150 GW is Hydro that also can't work 24/7 (there is not enough water). What's left? 106 GW of Nuclear power.

What you really need is not "installed capacity" but "electricity production per year". In 2021, ZAES produced 36 114 GWh of electricity. It's ~1.3% of EU electricity production (2 781 332 GWh in 2020).

Note also that the main consumer of ZAES electricity was Ukraine, not EU. For them, ZAES produced about 20% of electricity.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Trust me. I know what I'm doing." -- Sledge Hammer

Working...