Exhibit 1,374,882 that a large number of people are really stupid. And should be largely ignored.

We have lost.

And I, for one, welcome our new idiot overlords. I'd like to remind them as a trusted I.T. personality, I can be helpful in rounding up others to toil in their tech systems.

(No! Never! RAGE... RAGE! against the dying of the light.)

I'd LOVE to put my clients on M4 Mac minis! Many of them are currently running Win10 and Win11, unsupported, on Intel iMacs and Mac minis. However, no QBEnterprise for macOS, and running QBE on Win11 within a VM is also -vehemently- unsupported by Intuit. (Not that my clients would really grasp using a virtual machine.) Plus Parallels' licensing fees are just crazy expensive now and VMware doesn't support Unity any longer (nor ever did on Apple silicon), so it just gets 'confusing' for non-advanced users. VMware even killed the Default Apps feature that allowed you to 'capture' handlers like "mailto", to use Mac apps instead of Windows apps... that was a great feature! (Broadcom is braindead on VMware, obvs.)
Would be great to see Apple grasp that Bootcamp for Windows Arm would be a 'good thing' for them, but they're not going to...and it isn't like Microsoft is going to help that along either, since it would pretty much kill any hope they have of boosting the nascent Arm-based-PC market. I'm fairly confident, given the crazy pricing I've been seeing in the past several months in the PC world--with comparatively lacking performance making for a terrible value proposition--that Apple could take at least 25% of the global market if they officially supported Win 11 Arm. But... they won't.

I was informed by Intuit QuickBooks Enterprise support last week that the same policy will be applied with the QuickBooks Desktop/Enterprise products. Even if one pays Microsoft for extended support, Intuit will not provide support for their products running on Windows 10. Even products that had been previously qualified for support on Windows 10! (Which, right now, is everything.) As in, if they find out a customer is still running on Windows 10, they'd end the support call.
[Then again, Intuit 'Support' isn't all that great to begin with, not sure customers are really missing out on anything.]

OK, Microsoft... now please give us back MS Publisher 2021 LTSC licenses.

Have WAY TOO MANY clients that are small businesses and non-profits that -still- rely on Publisher. (Yes, I KNOW "UGH!" But, that's where we are.) Yanking the rug out from under them, not even allowing them to OPEN old Publisher files after October 2026, is asinine.

If weâ(TM)ve learned anything from the COVID debacle, certainly we should have learned that our scientific âbettersâ(TM) arenâ(TM)t always correct. Which is how science works. So just because âoescienceâ (aka âoethe geniuses posting at Wikipediaâ) currently posits that this alternative is âunprovenâ(TM) does NOT invalidate or âoedebunkâ it. Thatâ(TM)s NOT how science works. We only know what we think we know.
After all, those are the same group of âscientistsâ(TM) whoâ"until this pointâ"likely also âbelievedâ(TM) the core was round like a ball. âoeScienceâ changes. Looks like we maybe donâ(TM)t know what we thought we knew. Change.

âoe After five years of pioneering research into the abuse of social platformsâ
Quite a charitable description of their activity, given recent revelations. Misleading and propagandizing to the very end.

To expand on that, the Fukushima reactor did not implement retrofits that the US NRC had forced down to U.S. reactors of the same design that specifically addressed the issue of a hydrogen gas build up within the containment vessel, automatically venting it if necessary. TEPCO knew of the design upgrade and refused?/chose not to/failed to implement it. And that was the single most catastrophic mistake. If the hydrogen gas hadn't exploded in the containment vessel, Fukashima would likely be a different story today.

Wow⦠âoeMasks Work.â How did that headline get past the Slashdot editors? This site, between the COVIDiocy and anti-nuclear power hot-takes, has really fallen off a cliff.

First off, âoemasks workâ is an OPINION of a HISTORIAN, notâ"according to the ACTUAL SCIENCEâ"backed by SCIENCE; it is not a statement of FACT. Opinions should never be in a headline.

Secondly, anyone who has bothered to do any reading on this topic knows that the âoescience is settledâ position is ludicrous. As evidenced in the post, âoeonly six [studies] were actually conducted during the COVID-19 pandemicâ. Well, why THE FSCK is that??!? What the actual F were the people tasked with knowing this stuff, actual âoescientistsâ, DOING between SARS and 2019, if not doing the research work of determining mitigation strategies?? They certainly were getting paid. (Turns out we KNOW what they were doing now: they were off-shoring illegal and unethical serial-passage gain-of-function research on coronaviruses to a thinly-veiled ChiCom bioweapons-adjacent BSL-2 laboratory chasing antiviral drug patents the self-same ChiComs were trying to IP thieve.) Maybe there should have been active masking studies established to bolster the dictates⦠but they didnâ(TM)t bother with that, just like anll the other authoritarian dictators in history.

Finally, it is beyond absurd for a âoehistorian of scienceâ to twist âoescienceâ into being defined as **accepting** a hypothesis sans proof until evidence disputes as the way it works. This is, perhaps, the most egregious cudgel the pro-mask âoesideâ has chosen to wield. It is literally the opposite of how the scientific method is defined to work. How do the Slashdot editors allow this nonsense??

I donâ(TM)t get the fools on this site complaining about the Vision Pro price. What has happened to Slashdot? True Nerds have a sense of history, and understand how technology cost curves work. Along with basic Economics.
In 1990, I paid over $3,500 for my first Mac, a IIci. The 13-inch Apple Trinitron monitor that accompanied was another $999!
Go to DollarTimes and check the inflation calculator. $3500 of todayâ(TM)s dollars is not -that- much money, thanks to the Federal Reserve and out-of-control gov spending. And if the Vision Pro is the game-changing tech (like the Mac was in 1984) that all of Appleâ(TM)s VR/AR -competitors- seem to believe it is, $3,500 will historically be sensical. Further, a large number of consumers are buying $1,000 Pro iPhones every year! (Yes, I know, they arenâ(TM)t paying that much every year.) Point is, they can and do spend when they feel the tech warrants.
Will the first version of Vision Pro be the be-all/end-all? No, of course not, just as the little black-and-white Mac in 1984 was not⦠but by the IIci in 1990, the revolution was obvious. (OK, wasnâ(TM)t to everyone; DOS morons were shouting fealty to the command-line and proclaiming Windows a fad well past 2000.) The 2007 iPhone and 2010 iPad were pricing aberrations, an unusual step, but neither fulfilled the promise of the form-factor; that took another 3 or 4 iterations. Has this community gotten so misguidedly spoiled because of them??

TL;DR: The people on here complaining about the price are idiots. Ignore.

So⦠shouldnâ(TM)t Elon be talking with the Indian government about turning the southern tip of India into the preeminent spaceport on Earth? Seems to me that launching from +328ft, out across a low-gravity well, reaching Max-Q over top of it, would be beneficial, eh? I wonder how much so, however.
With Starship/Superheavy, SpaceX is eeking out percentage point increases of max thrust with the newest engines; offsetting gravity to gain a few more percentage points, off the coast of a low-cost, skilled labor country, would seem to be valuable.

Oh, hey, âoejournalistsâ from the New York Times⦠where the frak have you been? No better example of âoeNo duh.â

All of this was âoediscussedâ in early 2019, under threat of being deplatformed by the political interests the NYTs pretty obviously represents. At this point, thanks for the âoeinfoâ, but now Iâ(TM)m more curious about the sudden interest. Next theyâ(TM)re going to try to convince me that weâ(TM)ve ALWAYS been at war with Eastasia.

Hmmmmma year or so ago I reported to Microsoft security that I'd gotten a spam email (for an AMEX card) to a unique email address that I'd ONLY used when communicating with Microsoft for one of my clients that would have been "'interactions between Microsoft and prospective customers,' including around the planning and implementation of Microsoft services." They were pretty insistent it wasn't a breach on their side, which was completely impossible, since the address was completely unique (and not guessable). Guess I know differently now! Wonder how long this exposed??

Please.

Thank you.

(What is needed, specifically, is the updated version of either the CD or the patcher, long lost, that fixed the audio on 68040 Macs, where the program runs much better but audio is bad because of changes in System 7.5.1 or 2. Trying to find that patcher, or a correct CD, is next to impossible. I own the older version, v1.1.1, but never had gotten the patched version, v1.1.2. So I can't get it running properly on newer emulators.)

And Big Cable had pulled this same strategy with the 25/3 decision; they lobbied to move the goal posts just beyond the very edge of where the primary competitor, DSL, could deliver. Which effectively took the incumbent local telcos off the playing field for subsidies. (Then they buried any and all mention of the lower-priced tiers so that customers who would have qualified for them knew nothing about them. Reps would straight out lie about their existence. Worse, the Feds let them write the program eligibility requirements such that if a customer attempted to pay the "real rates", but financially could not afford them, they became ineligible for the subsidized service unless they disconnected for 90 days and paid any outstanding balance. Which was completely impractical during the COVID lockdowns, so the fallout is going to get worse over the next year.)

As always: #FollowTheMoney

I don't blame the Capitalists, I expect greed. I blame the politicians and governing "elite" class...they're the ones who can't seem to understand for whom they work. They're clearly innumerate and blithely ignore potential consequences. (Well, we see how they've reacted to the Jan 6th "circus", perhaps they're not so blithe anymore, just wishfully obtuse.)