I don't assume that the draft age will not be expanded. Assumptions which once seemed safe now appear quaint.

It's going to keep getting hit as long as the orange shitgibbon is in office, and there will surely be knock-on effects, so a ten year scale is not wholly satisfying either.

We never saw him get shot.

His doctor claimed he had a hole in his ear the size of a fucking penny, which is so much bullshit on every level that you have to be among the dumbest motherfuckers on the planet to believe it.

Medicaid fraud is quite rare, and if someone commits deliberate fraud the welfare cops can and will come after them for it. People who don't have money are eligible to Medicaid, so recovery is very possible. Remember, it's not fraud unless someone gets benefits because they lie.

Reels are bad because the interface is bad. It's worse than normal posts.

I'm guessing they won't fix that, so now all videos will have a bad interface.

Instead, they believe that things are real because they saw them on a three-letter shit factory on the teevee, because they aren't equipped to know that it's a lot of bullshit. The difference is, they might find some facts on social media.

I believe there is an alternate explanation for this. Salesforce has built its business making false promises about results, and yet they continue to find customers. Therefore they have been trained by their customer base to tell outrageous lies.

Not to people who are paying attention and aren't in love with crony capitalism, no. But it is indeed a surprise to people who worship economic success as if it were proof of superior morality.

It took some work to try and decode what this story was really about, and what the actual goals of the paper abstract were trying to accomplish. This looks like a thinly veiled fanboi attempt to heap even more hype on LLMs. The goal seems to be to create a standard to use to judge both how 'useful' LLMs have become, and to monitor progress and identify specific shortfalls and areas that still need improvement. All the social circles and web sites that seem interested in this all appear to be very pro LLM. As goals go, I guess I can't be overly critical. LLM does seem to have some niche use cases where it is actually useful, and improving it seems a worthy goal. But that seems far out of proportion to the type machine behind it all. In the early 90s I went into college thinking I would be part of the cohort that would unlock strong AI. I left college thinking that current efforts were basically impossible, and we'd need some new innovations to produce new and meaningful paths forward. I remain confused with those who seem to think LLM is that path. I agree it has things to teach us on the path towards AGI, but I still don't see it as an important breakthrough towards that goal. And, of course, all the hype makes it very difficult to try and discern fact from fiction.

There you go creating more material for your masturbatory fantasies of competence.

Then you definitely believe fake news.

So where do we find an even bigger expired carbon fiber tube and an even bigger idiot to build a sub out of it? We still have way too many billionaires.

If you read the last article about these clowns you can see their own study shows it's crap.

Every accusation is a confession with you cucks, so... You say your problem is a tiny penis? Not surprised at all here.

It's hard to know if I got down modded for suggesting that Firefox is not perfect, which we all know, or that Chrome is a way for Google to collect your info and sabotage ad blocking, which we all know