Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment The problem is lack of generation capacity (Score 1) 121

What these groups need to do to protect vulnerable people is to make sure we build new powerplants soon. It's so sleazy of them to act like they're trying to protect customers from paying high prices for energy when for decades they basically caused energy prices to get so high by having a problem with basically every possible way of generating energy.

Comment Here what I expect (Score 3, Insightful) 99

Right now, we're noticing that Chinese companies are offering us exploitative deals, and we don't like it, and think that tariffs will fix it. But with tariffs in place, we will find that now it's American companies that are offering us the exploitative deals, but they can charge more now, because they're insulated from outside competition. What I'm saying is that intranational capitalism is just as sleazy and brutal as international capitalism - only less efficient, because it's less competitive.

Comment Pay this back with what money? (Score 2) 83

I love AI and I would and could pay for it if I had to, but why would I pick OpenAI to pay? Their product is not really better than their competitors' products, and sometimes it's clearly worse. They have the advantage of being the first mover in their field, and that gives them inertia with low-information customers - the new AOL.com. But apart from that, they have huge debts and not much else to distinguish them. Their best employees had left, and their former partners have become wary of the way they operate. Projections of their future profitability must be based on the expectation that their AI will figure out some better business plan than what the OpenAI humans have come up with!

Comment Don't get too happy about Chinese "overcapacity" (Score 1) 155

So now China is making too many electric cars and solar panels, compared to domestic demand. Their solution was to export that stuff. Now we want to impose tariffs on those things, so that global demand for Chinese stuff is artificially depressed. But when China loses markets for their stuff, what will they make with their comically overbuilt production capacity? Not solar panels or clean cars, but weapons. It turns out tariffs don't stop the "export" of bombs and missiles and attack drones to Taiwan.

Comment Re:Predatory pricing (Score 1) 41

This is all government enabled. Lantus launched in 1999 at $38 a vial cash. It has 3 other competitors in the long acting insulin market and it's now several hundred dollars a vial. How? George W. Bush and Barack Obama's signature health care laws stated that the government wouldn't negotiate drug prices and, unsurprising to anyone who understands economics, the corporations who paid heavily to get that wording into law raised their prices, hurting Americans.

And every last fscker in Washington knows this. Biden's Inflation Reduction Act acknowledges it by stating that the Feds will start negitotiating drug prices....on 5 drugs in 2025 and up to 20 by 2030. Thanks for nothing.

Comment Red flags for me.... (Score 3, Informative) 29

You got an experimental drug going after amyloid plaques and the amyloid plaque data as a cause of alzheimer's is under significant scrutiny.

https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.science.org%2Fcontent%2Farticle%2Fpotential-fabrication-research-images-threatens-key-theory-alzheimers-disease

Slashdot Top Deals

Forty two.

Working...