Comment Re:The Register... (Score 1) 181
"But fair play to The Register, I frankly thought it was dead already, they've done well to keep such a useless publication going even this long."
Oh the irony posting this on Slashdot!
"But fair play to The Register, I frankly thought it was dead already, they've done well to keep such a useless publication going even this long."
Oh the irony posting this on Slashdot!
As someone who is English I understand that Slashdot is US centric at times....however this is an article in a UK publication by a UK author from a UK perceptive. I know no one RTFA to still.
Using Just-Ping to check from 50+ locations around the world only 5% have what is traditionally the correct IP (212.100.234.54 according to Netcraft) or so have the current IP most say the DNS is down.
http://just-ping.com/index.php?vh=www.theregister.co.uk&c=&s=ping!
I forced an update with Netcraft it now has a record of the another IP 68.68.20.116 with different server headers which I presume is the broken site.
http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph?site=www.theregister.co.uk
The hackers could have done more damage if they also increased the TTL of the domains they poisoned. 24 hours seems to be the time atm.
Obviously you say April Fools however the best jokes are based on some fact and the fact is I know of at least 2 senior and talented devs that worked on MS Kinect project and around release time jumped ship to Google.
eg My old friend Ryan Geiss is one who co-wrote the skeletal tracking for Kinect is now at google.
http://www.geisswerks.com/about_natal.html
So they are apps designed for a browser platform specfic implementation of a dev version of HTML5. Hardly standards like what was implied........
"let them access sites and Web applications that rely on standards that IE doesn't support, primarily HTML5."
What does this mean? HTML5 is still in dev. Are there really sites or app that *rely* on it?
The only things that browsers can support is the latest betas of this of HTML5.
MS basing is one thing about standards but is it is another to quote standards that do not exist yet.........
According to netcraft in the last year there has been about 40% increase in fully qualified domain names out there (includes subdomains not just top level so not a perfect stat but a good indication)
June 2008 172,338,726 FQDNs (http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2008/06/index.html)
June 2009 238,027,855 FQDNs (http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2009/06/17/june_2009_web_server_survey.html)
So really you could say that cyber squatting is decreasing relative to the increase in domain names........
Not really increasing compared to domain names
I agree, many corps have a similar attitude and therefore the stats are become more meaningless. There area a lot of corp workers that use older browsers and cannot/will not upgrade. What use is a message on Google for those people.
I atm work for Vodafone running their intranet. The browser policy is IE6.
Also how are they a browser can be out of date and unpatched and there is no way for the website to know this. They can only look at the user agent string to find this out and that will only tell you what browser version they are using not the patch level of it in say IE. It will just say 5.5, 6 or 7 or 8, etc.
Top Ten Things Overheard At The ANSI C Draft Committee Meetings: (2) Thank you for your generous donation, Mr. Wirth.