Yes. One prime example for the Dunning-Kruger effect is driving skills. For reference just look at accident and injury statistics. No appliance or industrial system with a safety record this bad would even be legal.

If you want somebody that is a bad driver and knows it, I am one. I never caused any accident, but I stopped driving as soon as it was possible. These days I do not even own a car.

LLMs ARE glorified autocomplete. The real learning is that even simple mechanisms can do impressive things when scaled up enough. They do not exceed their inherent limitations though, scaling cannot do that. Hence no AGI via the LLM path.

Yes. A crass violation of KISS and the philosophy that makes Unix superior: https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2F...

The main argument for self-driving cars is that human drivers are, on average, really bad. And that most of the bad human drivers think they are really good and hence add lack of care to bad skills.

I would also like to remind everybody that a few years ago, I think the CEO of Ford predicted that self-driving will be eventually enforced by the car insurers, because premiums for humans will become unsustainable. Looks too me like we are nicely on track.

It was probably real, but I am wondering whether it was staged, i.e. a big dishonest illusion created to "demonstrate" how incredibly powerful their toy is. Only, it is not and all we got to see is that OpenAI and Anthropic cannot even do a sandbox competently and that IT security as Huggingface is total crap.

Obviously the ones that got attacked has very bad security. But also obviously the LLM test environment had even worse security. This is a while incompetence-fest all around. And also obviously, this has nothing to do with training. The isolation environment is not part of the LLM. It is part of the environment the LLM is run on.

Yes. They are lying, plain and simple. What they gad was isolation and monitoring failures, either due to abject incompetence or due to intent. Hence, what needs to be fixed is the isolation and the monitoring, NOT the training.

Exactly. Especially as changing training will do nothing. They have incompetently done isolation and monitoring for their testing environments. That is a completely different area and has nothing to do with the LLM. Hence this whole claim they made is nothing but a big fat lie. Not their first either.

Exactly. This is not a training problem. This is a failure to isolate and monitor competently. The fix is NOT with the LLM.

Indeed. This is not about what the LLM can do. This is about incompetent isolation and monitoring. It is, for example, dead simple to detect when LLM traffic makes it outside the isolation environment and stop all things if that happens. That this obvious safeguard, and several other equally obvious ones, were not in place makes me think this whole thing is either incompetence so abysmally bad that it is hard to imagine, or the whole thing was done intentionally (making it criminal, just like use of any other hacking tool) or maybe even a completely staged and planned event.

They now "pause training" to fix things? How are they going to do that? Fire everybody and hire people with a clue? Somehow I do not see that as likely.

Do some minimal research. You do know how to use a search engine?

Incompetence. There has, unfortunately, been an influx of low-skill, low-insight Windows people into Linux for a while. For the Debian decision. the tech board had been compromised by Red Hat people (former, mostly), that made a political decision instead of a technological one.

So you think. You need to get your head out of your behind, as I said. You just cannot deal with people knowing stuff and then disagreeing with you. You are clearly a cretin with a hugely inflated ego.

Currently, it is the state of things in the EU and the US. That makes for a very compelling argument. The UK seems to think different, but nobody really cares about the UK antics anymore.