Comment Feeling conflicted. (Score 1) 29
While the cable lobby is correct and I hope they prevail, I also hope they are forced to pay a huge fine for being a bunch of hypocritical assholes. We don't need to criminalize it, just make hypocrisy financially painful.
Comment Re:There was a mass shooting (Score 1) 87
Yes but obviously getting banned was very upsetting. Just look, she soon went on to kill 8 other people and then herself!
Comment Re:Easy Blame Game When You're Clueless (Score 2) 46
especially if you didn't have eDiscovery logging and software already in place
It seems pretty negligent if a police department doesn't already have something like this in place.
Comment Re:Here we go again (Score 1) 45
You may have survived, presumably that's because no one thinks someone would masturbate to you.
Ouch. Solid burn, and on point. Well played.
Comment Re:Strange line to draw (Score 1) 45
Seems like a head-mounted camera is fine under this ban, though, as long as it isn't also covert?
FTFY. The issue at hand is that it's a hidden camera.
Comment Re:There was a mass shooting (Score 1) 87
Why is it so easy to ask ChatGPT how best to kill people?
The interface is in natural written language which is the selling point of the whole thing. Additionally, it's not actually intelligent so it is not cognizant of anything much less the harm the information may cause.
Bottom line: it's just a machine.
Comment Re:There was a mass shooting (Score 1) 87
In Canada someone used ChatGPT to plan a mass shooting. It was detected and the account was shut down, but it was decided not to report it to police. She went on to kill 8 people in a school shooting and herself.
We can't actually know if the scenario was a plan or a precautionary measure, you know, safety first.
However, what we know for sure is that she went on a mass shooting after her account was suddenly closed without explanation. This is exactly why they shouldn't shut down someone's account without providing them with a clear a rationale!
Comment Re:Laws of physics (Score 1) 17
you end up with so many adjustable terms that your model could predict many things.
FTFY.
It seems wiser to identify what could be possible before claiming what is impossible.
Comment Re:Element Pro is not Open Source (Score 2, Insightful) 66
It's already the case that European government are moving their physical gold reserves out of the US because they know that Trump might steal it. It's clear that besides looting the US Treasury for his personal gain, he's turned the entire country of Venezuela his personal piggy bank.
Are you stupid enough to think that just because Microsoft is a huge financial entity that he won't use it to get what he wants? We all know that anything that MS controls is riddled with back doors ans this administration has already used them for financially corrupt reasons.
This is a permanent change. Post Trump no county in the world can trust the United states on anything. We make China look honest.
Comment Re:Open version. (Score 3) 11
It's a theoretical study of the interactions of phonons, i.e. quantized vibration in condensed matter. If the phonons have handedness then pseudo-particles can form have eight fold symmetry. They suggest known physical system with these properties and how they might be detected.
That's all I've got. Sorry no pussy jokes. Maybe this time I'm the grownup in the room.
Comment Re:It's an Electron app. (Score 1) 70
it's slow as hell.
Comment Will they confiscate non-MS laptops? (Score 0, Troll) 19
BTW, is it legal to use Linux to do official business in Washington state? Asking for a friend.
Comment It's an Electron app. (Score 1) 70
I believe the issues is that for whatever reason they wrote this thing in typescript so it runs with Electron. Not only that, they are now merging the desktop client into their "web client" which mean it's a fucking web page.
With this in mind, I fully understand the nonconstructive criticisms.
Comment Missing the obvious solution (Score 2) 54
I feel like these AI processes should be launched as a separate unprivileged user and group. Only when you change the file permissions should they be able to access your files. This avoids possible flaws in agent interfaces and hands off the responsibility to the OS. Why are simple solutions like this so hard to grasp?