More women than men have been entering college/university AND graduating than men.

And overwhelmingly in arts, not STEM.

>Now this isn't automatically going to be "Kill all humans"
Until someone hacks it to do that.
And it will be hacked, like everything else.

Emphasis on "maybe".
In other words, no way to know how fast it may be until it exists.
Which it doesn't.

Known Physics would at least need a fundamental extension to explain it

Nonsense. We have no idea how AGI relates to "regular" physics.

Yes. They are called "actors".

Or:
1. print the image on a high-quality large size printer
2. scan the print to a new image file
3. PROFIT!

If someone writes a libelous article about someone else, do
you punish MS Office? No, you punish the fucker who
wrote it. This "holding an AI legally responsible" is just a
gimmick so the company that uses it won't be held
responsible.

"No, I didn't shoot you. The gun shot you!"

There's no reason to think it can't be, outside of hand-wavy
philosophy.

We just don't fucking know.

> The massive hardware is necessary to do Fake AI, but I don't think it will be needed to implement Real AI.

That's right. All you need is a human brain. I wonder where
we could find one?

Define "Real AI".
You can't, and nobody else can. Nobody ever will.
It's a mythical concept that has no
basis in reality. The best we can ever do is have a
system that does a really good imitation of "Real AI",
and that's enough.

For passenger vehicles, yes.

But for commercial vehicles, e.g. trains, ships and aircraft,
the added weight and size of the H2 tanks is insignificant.
Nor is the availability of hydrogen fueling depots important,
since these big vehicles already have dedicated fueling facilities.