Unlike other adapted novels, Fallout didn't have a single main story or definite cast of characters that Amazon can make a mess with.
That's true, but the Fallout stories are set in a world with a wealth of established history, lore, organizations, biological systems, etc. The fact that they are setting this in a new area with a new Vault means they probably aren't going to mess with individual established characters, there is plenty of other stuff for them to mess up. For instance, what's with the cyclops overseer shown in the trailer? Maybe it's an interesting spin on Vault-Tec's use of the Vaults to conduct horribly unethical experiments on their citizens, or maybe it's just dumb retconning.
They can make a show jump the shark before the first episode airs.
If you have to avoid doing certain things for fear the government will ban them, the problem isn't the things you're doing, it's the government.
They didn't use blockchain?
Oh no! Facebook didn't censor the people we don't like!
Back in the day, John Gilmore coined the phrase "The Internet Perceives Censorship as Damage and Routes Around It" and it was often repeated here. Nowadays it's the opposite - people expect censorship to be the norm, and routing around it is damage. It's a fun coincidence that the current top article on
and they always will be.
Today I got a "News about XYZ" email from LinkedIn, which took me to a newspaper article about one of my former colleagues who is now vice president of a large government services firm. I was expecting something about a major contract win or a new product or service he was touting. Instead, the article was about how the company he works for is mismanaging a huge state government computer system, customers and taxpayers are furious, and the guy in charge of the agency had called my former colleague to complain but was not satisfied with the response. Not a good look. So if you're in a position to get your name in the papers, be aware that LinkedIn might help spread the word - for good or ill.
Per capita CO2 numbers mean nothing. Most of China is not industrialized, so it's not really surprising that their per capita output is lower. It's more interesting to look at CO2 per unit of GDP, which reflects how carbon efficient a country's industries are.
That assumes the array is sorted. The problem doesn't state that.
Surprise your boss. Get to work on time.