Comment Re:N. Tesla is more relevant than ever: (Score 1) 18
So you are taking the easy way out, the Ignoramus Ignorabimus.
So you are taking the easy way out, the Ignoramus Ignorabimus.
Yes, the problem with 'end-to-end encrypted traffic' is one end is the device, and the other end is the manufacturer. The supposed owner gets no look at the data 'his' device is sending
If (say) the bus services a naval base, very sensitive information may be transmitted (stop location, duration, schedule, internal fuel level...)
If only a strange hybrid of John Deere and Tesla built buses, those would not have this problem, right?
Right?
I don't know why large buyers, in particular, allow end-to-end encrypted traffic between the vendor and the products the buyer ostensibly owns.
At the very least, the traffic should be open to inspection by the buyer, who should be able to selectively turn off or disable aspects of it.
If you want to throw a moral hissy fit anyway, be my guest.
1. That nuclear is "compact", which it isn't. Your error is a factor of about 2.5, a nuclear plant requires more land than the equivalent solar farm at most latitudes where solar makes sense. Dunno about wind, I hear it makes the view terrible and kills many orange-feathered birds.
I tooked the area of the Flamanville Block 3, France nuclear plant as an example. It's a 1.6 GW plant covering an area of about 1.4 square kilometers. I was rounding it for better calculation.
2. That nuclear is (under the current regulatory regimes) cheaper than it is. Your error is a factor of 3 or more. But I guess that can be overcome by cutting regulation.
Again, I was using the Flamanville nuclear plant as an example. Total construction cost was 13 billion Euros.
Please, tell me again, what you believe to know differently.
When a Banker jumps out of a window, jump after him--that's where the money is. -- Robespierre