Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment mulitple revenue streams are conflict of interest (Score 1) 54

There should be a rule for makers of devices and software that says if you take money from a user, you can only get income from them. I know that sounds strange, but this is for the same reason they don't let you be both broker and market-maker in finance.

Of course you can make more money doing it this way and this is why it should be outlawed, because if some do it, that forces everyone to do it.

Comment Re:Common solutions (Score 1) 47

If it's just "a few lines of code" then eventually other bright people with figure it out, even without spting. Most optimizations aren't that hard to imagine.

That's just not true. I've seen brilliantly original ideas that took only a handful of lines to express. Not the whole implementation, mind you, but it would be enough to just see those few to know what it did, if you were another expert. They weren't mere optimizations.

You don't measure the magnitude of breakthroughs by the number of lines of code it takes to convey what they are.

Comment Re:Don't expose your illiteracy this way. (Score 0) 86

A huge pet peeve of mine is someone makes an in-depth YouTube video about something on subject X, then proceeds to wildly mispronounce X through the entire video.

What's worse is that these people tend to receive corrections like the one you just gave with contempt, like a child being asked to clean their plate or something.

Comment Re:Some Actual Info (Score 1) 233

1. Fluoride only protects teeth by contact.
Partially true but misleading.
Fluoride’s primary benefit is topical—it strengthens enamel by remineralizing it and making it more resistant to acid. However, systemic fluoride (ingested fluoride) does have a role in forming stronger enamel during tooth development in children. While adults primarily benefit from topical application, children benefit from both topical and systemic exposure.

2. Swallowed fluoride is toxic to humans in many ways.
Partially true but exaggerated.
Toxicity depends on dose. In excessive amounts, fluoride can be harmful, but at recommended levels in drinking water (typically 0.7 ppm in the U.S.), evidence suggests it is safe and effective at reducing tooth decay.

2.1. Pineal gland calcification
Weakly supported.
Studies show fluoride accumulates in the pineal gland, but its direct impact on sleep, puberty, or reproductive hormones is speculative. Pineal gland calcification happens naturally with age, and while fluoride may contribute, no strong evidence links it directly to negative health effects.
2.2. Fluoride can weaken bones.
True, but only at high doses.
Excess fluoride exposure (e.g., in regions with naturally high fluoride levels in water) is linked to skeletal fluorosis, which weakens bones. However, the fluoride levels in fluoridated water are well below the threshold for this risk.

2.3. Fluoride competes with iodine.
Oversimplified.
Fluoride, bromine, and iodine are all halogens, but their interactions in the body are complex. There is some evidence that high fluoride exposure may affect thyroid function, but normal fluoridation levels do not appear to cause significant issues. The claim that modern humans have an iodine deficiency due to fluoride is not well-supported.

2.4. Fluoride damages the thyroid.
Weak evidence at common exposure levels.
High fluoride intake (e.g., >4 ppm in water) has been linked to hypothyroidism, but standard fluoridation levels (0.7 ppm) have not been conclusively shown to harm thyroid function in the general population.

2.5. Accumulative toxicity.
True in extreme cases, but misrepresented.
Fluoride can accumulate in bones and tissues over decades, but regulatory agencies monitor fluoride levels to prevent toxic accumulation. The claim that "damage slowly accumulates" lacks strong evidence at recommended fluoride exposure levels.

2.6. Intestinal distress.
Rare at recommended doses.
Fluoride ingestion in large amounts can cause gastrointestinal irritation. However, the amount in drinking water is far below the threshold for causing noticeable distress in most people.

2.7. Fluorosis.
True, but mostly cosmetic at normal exposure levels.
Dental fluorosis (mild white spots on teeth) can occur with excess fluoride exposure during childhood, but in areas with regulated fluoridation, severe cases are rare.

3. There are far better alternatives to Fluoride.
Some alternatives exist, but fluoride remains highly effective.

3.1. Hydroxyapatite as a replacement.
Promising but not fully proven as superior.
Hydroxyapatite is a natural component of enamel and shows effectiveness in preventing cavities, but long-term comparative studies are limited. Fluoride has decades of research proving its efficacy. Hydroxyapatite is a viable alternative but not yet a proven universal replacement.

3.2. Avoiding acidic foods.
Good general advice, but not a replacement for fluoride.
Reducing acidic intake helps protect enamel, but it does not actively strengthen teeth like fluoride does.

3.3. Brushing twice daily.
Good advice, but fluoride enhances remineralization.
Brushing is crucial, but fluoride toothpaste enhances cavity prevention by promoting remineralization.

3.4. Low-carb diets prevent cavities.
True but impractical for many people.
Reducing carbohydrates reduces bacteria growth and acid production in the mouth. However, most people consume some level of carbs, making fluoride an important protective factor.

4. Nearly everyone gets fluoride from toothpaste.
True, but water fluoridation still benefits populations with limited dental care.
Water fluoridation was introduced when fewer people had access to fluoride toothpaste. While toothpaste is now widespread, water fluoridation remains beneficial, particularly for populations at higher risk of cavities.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Don't tell me I'm burning the candle at both ends -- tell me where to get more wax!!"

Working...