You might like WaterFox better.

WaterFox works well and (so far) hasn't leaned into the AI crap. My guess is it'll strip that out but we'll see.

If that can be proved, then maybe Ukraine has a case. If it can't then they don't. If various parties in the Stans are laundering parts through multiple channels (rather than buying direct) then there would be no way for OEMs to know that their parts are ultimately bound for Russian drones or missiles.

That's different, and amounts to a conspiracy in terms of facilitating evasion of export controls. If you can prove that then you have a case. But do you?

Jumpin' Jesus on a pogo stick! Everybody knows the burrow owl lives in a hole in the ground! Why the hell do you think they call it a burrow owl, anyway!?

Blaming tech companies for Russia's evasion of sanctions seems foolish. You'd have to prove that said companies conspired with the Russian Federation to evade sanctions.

Russia is destroying itself. Anyone who cares for the future of the Russian people would halt the war in Ukraine immediately.

HBO went well out of their way to pull in Sesame Street/Sesame Workshop and take their programming off PBS, leaving PBS with rerun scraps. Several years later, that plan is dead and Sesame Workshop is out on the streets.

Take shots at whomever you please. The results are the same.

There's nothing stopping the State of Arkansas from licensing individual programs from PBS and/or the associated production companies, either. They can pick and choose what they want, including older stuff that no longer airs.

Even HBO wants nothing to do with Big Bird anymore:

https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.npr.org%2F2024%2F12%2F17...

Yes, Trumpistan is subsidizing less. It may shock you to hear that, but oh well.

It just means that Paramount (and possibly Netflix) now have a solid reason to help the Republicans in 2026.

You don't seem to understand anything rogoshen said. Not one tiddly bit.

It's China, they're subsidized and they have to build something. Even if it's empty or otherwise represents overcapacity. Of course the people who built these datacentres may eventually lease the space to companies that will be forced to use domestically-produced hardware that no one wants to use (they'd rather have NV H200s or . . . whatever else). It's just how they do things, at least for now.

He ain't entirely wrong, in that environmentalist groups wouldn't dare set foot in China. They wouldn't last long over there.