Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:I'm not pro-union. BUT. (Score 1) 67

Companies don't have, or use, "teams of lawyers and a massive HR department to help them negotiate employment" with normal employees. *Maybe* they use those to help negotiate with C-level executives. For people working below $100k/year ($50/hour) I would be surprised if it involves more than one manager and maybe an HR person.

For the unwashed masses, they instead use teams of lobyists to buy politicians and ensure that laws that massively favour corporations and allow them to abuse their employees are passed.

Comment Re:Thank you for a good explanation of a problem (Score 1) 72

Under the Harper government, they tried to amend the Ethics guidelines for federal employees to require them to back cabinet ministers' decisions, instead of serving the public by providing the best information to ministers to inform their decisions. Since the Harper government was notoriously antI-science and very much ideologically driven, that pretty much would have transformed the Canadian public service into a bunch of apologists for ideologues. They didn't want to make informed decisions after examining the facts. They wanted to make decisions based on ideology first, and have the public service bend the facts to justify the decisions after the fact.

Comment Re:Make Congress (Score 4, Insightful) 182

The problem with the US Congress isn't the two party system. The two parties are simply a reflection of the fact that this country has two sides, and each side is irreconcilable with other. They literally hate each others' guts, to the point where the political minority in a given state is now moving to states that share their politics, hardening the red state/blue state divide, a process political scientists call "The Great Sort". You could eliminate parties altogether and mandate that elections are no -partisan and we'll still have the same problems. Eliminating first-past-the-post and implementing ranked choice this or that wouldn't change a damn thing as long as there are two Americas that loathe each other so much.

To think that a country of 300M people has exactly two sides to every issue is reductionist in the extreme. There's a whole swath of opinions and values in the USA, and trying to pigeonhole everyone in exactly two bins is stupid. If American politicians (especially the right) hadn't been busy fostering an artificial divide over the last few decades by spewing hateful, verifiable lies about the other side, maybe dialogue and cooperation might be possible. P0wning the other side for LULZ is no way to govern in a multicultural, modern society.

Slashdot Top Deals

10 to the 6th power Bicycles = 2 megacycles

Working...