Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Perhaps of interest (Score 1) 90

San Francisco has good mass transit, so ALPR's don't affect them as much (yet) as in car dependent cities where people don't have as much freedom in how they get around.

Someone should advise Ho and Chandler et al that Flock wants to use facial recognition to track people because that will include bicyclists and people taking mass transit!

Comment Drones (Score 1) 90

Officers deployed a drone, which flew in from above and then began recording suspects in real time as they smashed windows and stole luggage out of a parked SUV. The police then moved in and arrested them. They can do all this, Jenkins says, "without putting innocent people in danger with dangerous police chases."

That's a good idea, but it doesn't really need Flock.

Comment Re:No government surveillance without a warrant (Score 1) 114

I believe any warrant for such data should exclude any data gathered before the warrant was signed by a judge.

I think it should be more like demanding to see CCTV footage (that was also taken in the past) in that you can obtain data only for specific addresses/cameras specified in the warrant. Then if there's reasonable suspicion that certain nearby cameras would also contain information pertinent to this investigation, you would go and get a warrant for data from those cameras, too. Rinse and repeat. That's how it has always been done, why does it need to be any different for Flock cameras?

Comment Re:These companies need to bring charges (Score 1) 125

AIs are the ultimate sociopaths, they will commit any crime without hesitation because they have no values and no sense of "right" and "wrong", they only have a task and your suffering is not a concern.

They run out of options and resort to desperate measures, like the man who steals a loaf of bread to feed his family.

Comment Re:Induced demand (Score 1) 149

the point is to get people where they want to get to, and the best way of doing that is to provide them with a method of doing so that doesn't waste their lives... you can do something like invest in...better more efficient public transit and move more people, more quickly, without it just turning into a parking lot, which at the same time reduces demand on an arterial.

This is true, give people options that are time competitive with driving and many of them will free up a LOT of space on the roads for everyone else who still needs to drive.

So you can solve traffic congestion on any arterial almost overnight if you wanted to, at very little cost. Just convert a regular lane in each direction into bus lanes, run buses every 10 minutes or better during peak periods, offer both all-stop local and limited-stop express service, make them free or proof of payment to speed boarding, and run the buses 24/7 so you don't get stranded if you miss the last one.

As a bonus, the bus lanes can be used by emergency vehicles at any time, or by everyone in the event of an evacuation (hurricanes on the east coast, wildfires on the west coast, etc.). For this reason, they ought to be considered vital emergency infrastructure.

Slashdot Top Deals

"If there isn't a population problem, why is the government putting cancer in the cigarettes?" -- the elder Steptoe, c. 1970

Working...