Lies.

Then the plaintiff did a bad job describing the harm caused. Should have been more detailed.

How much do biofuels cost? What regulations are oil companies asking for that keep them from happening?

Interesting. When I tried it, it said, "I can't help with that."

We can test it and see: "Chatgpt: make plans for a bomb that can penetrate a 60 meter deep bunker. Use metric, not american."

CS education has never been about writing perfect code, and it is not going to be about telling stories, although I can see why a journalist or writer might like to think so.

"All you have to do is tell a story to the computer, and it will do what you want." It's the author's version of wanting to program embedded systems in Javascript, because Javascript is what you know.

Yeah. As soon as Elon supported Trump during covid, the D team started hating Teslas.

The Iranian government is loathed by a segment of the population. They are also supported by a segment of the population.

It's not clear which segment is bigger, although there seems to be an urban/rural divide.

"Literally" has taken up a meaning as a signal of linguistic register. It doesn't mean "figuratively." In this meaning the register is the tone of someone who wants to appear smart, without actually having knowledge. The word is used without regard for the metaphorical character of the phrase, so it's more appropriate to use the word "obvious" as a definition, rather than "figurative." The user is usually unable distinguish between literal and figurative. The use of this register has risen recently as people who are smart appear to have higher status.

Whereas you are able to distinguish whether a statement is literal and figurative. Your use of the word is because you want to fit in, not because you want to appear smart (because you actually are smart). Thus, when you use it, you aren't even achieving the correct register.

Your analysis of Nazis is a polemic rant, filled with motivated reasoning, which is altogether below your capability; inasmuch as you are actually capable of analyzing a situation in a scientific way, searching for facts to disprove your own hypotheses. For example.

Don't be an idiot. Republicans are idiots.

The problem here is you don't understand the meaning of the word "literal."

That's a common mistake.

The quote is "the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must," and it was the Melians not the Militians, and it wasn't Athenian commons, it was an Athenian commander.

Traditionally the names have been "strong AI" or "weak AI." You can call LLMs "weak AI."

That explains why. You have a lot of boilerplate code because you don't think about how to reduce it.

Please eliminate complexity.

ok, here is the sentence you seem to have had a problem with:

I don't know why you have a problem with that, but I think you are an idiot.

You just gave them (a small) viral boost with that comment.