That was certainly an assumptive rant.

Tell us more about how little you know about how votes are verified, despite the information being public

What does that have to do with this, coward?

As the story says, they also use Fake IDs. The drivers may not even exist, at least the identity on the ID doesn't.

Mu. Software doesn't know things.

Compilers are deterministic and don't depend on training data

Being anti-tech also isn't what the luddites were about, that's a facile interpretation of their views. Any time someone suggests otherwise they are demonstrating only ignorance.

One of those is not an extreme

Suck harder, cuck.

I propose chippity chop when they hit one billion. By that time they've already been doing plenty of damage

Robots absolutely will get those welding jobs eventually. They will just get all of the easier ones first.

I need food in my house.

If you were worth listening to, you wouldn't have needed help to write that comment.

So far US courts have said that person cannot have a copyright.

This might change up in the future, but so far, the prompter is not considered to be a creator.

That comment was about what if that code is later determined to have a copyright apply to it.