This entire article reads like a pretty obvious hit-piece and I can't see why anyone even fall of it at this point. One of the big arguments for mass de-platforming of controversial or just conservative personalities on social media is the argument that 'they're a private company' and thus can have whatever TOS they want. From day one Parler said they wanted to be for free speech but they never said that there were no rules at all on the site.
This article reads like someone that took their ideal of journalism from their reading of Saul Alinsky 'Rules for Radicals'. Try to hold your enemies to their own standers while ridiculing them about it.
Well there was that rodeo clown that got a life time ban from his... 'sport' for wearing an Obama mask. He had done it for every other president when they were in office. But he did it with Obama and he had to go. And there is also those sociopaths that think you're wearing 'digital black face' if you use a black person in a meme without being black yourself. Although in the later case the makers of South Park might get by with that if they use a black member of staff to work on it.
The point is that you'll always find some wing-nut that'll call you racist no mater what you say or even your intent.
How about we let the entire Hollywood infrastructure fucking burn? The entire industry is like a giant rotting fish that washed up on the shores of Malibu. It's rotten from the head down. A solid 90% of everything coming out of tensile town is either socio-political motivation art-house tat or just another rehashing of a classic IP, but this time made by people with double the budget but half the talent.
We don't know who it was that discovered water, but we're pretty sure that it wasn't a fish. -- Marshall McLuhan