That Harvard graduate sounds pretty smart, as he kept moving upwards despite his failures.
And yet, you would be foolish to hire him.
I'm not exactly clear what the issue is. Corrupting the CRC at the end of the packet if you didn't want to send it was something that was talked about in the 90s. I don't know if anyone was doing it but it was certainly talked about.
Around that time, maybe a bit later, Eurex introduced discard addresses. This meant that you could start writing the packet onto the wire and if you changed your mind before you got to the destination address of the TCP header, you could write in the discard address instead of the exchange address.
There's a paper somewhere (from Eurex) showing that the tick to trade back in 2017 was 39ns. It's completely obvious from that that people are starting writing the IOC onto the wire around the time the first 39 bytes of the market data tick are received.
Obviously there are other ways of sending valid orders that won't cross the book. For example, instead of writing the discard address into the TCP header, you write a price that is way off the market into the IOC. Obviously this means you can decide later - alternatively, you can start sending earlier.
I recall there being some large funding bills that were disproportionately targeted at red states, but I don't know whether one of them supported solar rollout.
I don't recall the current administration being fans of solar.
Code.org is just an industry advocacy group and lobbyist. Their actions demonstrate that their mission is to make money for tech companies, so they should have their nonprofit status revoked. They're basically just an industry marketing effort.
In every non-trivial program there is at least one bug.