Why not? This article isn't about the US it's about a place which has free healthcare.

When did they announce that there will be an Online GTA6?

Seems like a nice low-effort way to get a payoff.

There are very few use cases for running a pair of lockstep VMs these days, it is almost always better to refactor the application to run as a cluster where the loss of any individual member doesn't degrade the service.

Things will make a lot more sense to you when you realize he doesn't care about the economy in general. He's getting his, rewarding his friends, and doing favors, and that's all that matters to him.

Most of them are pretty low effort, and the ones that attempt to mimic a time period are rife with anachronisms and other errors. Because they aren't putting a ton of effort into them in terms of accuracy... mostly they're just trying to manually correct obvious AI problems. The larger problem is people using AI to rip clips from original content creators, plaster an AI generated "person" on top, and post it up as a "reaction video." Or using AI to slightly tamper with clips from movies or shows to dodge automatic content flagging systems.

The issue is that "Liberal Media" is desperately pushing a narrative that Signal itself is insecure, when in fact it's one of the most secure comms available. ANY app on an insecure device is a problem, and using ANY non-approved comms is a problem, but apparently their target audience isn't able to understand this level of "nuance." The focus of the criticism ought to be on the complete clown show itself and not on attacking Signal.

What I've noticed is that it seems to do a pretty good job of scraping various online coding forums/sites and returning the "top" answers with some slight modifications. But what it fails at is finding good solutions to weird corner cases or answering behavioral questions that aren't already documented. So for me personally I find it almost completely worthless, since those are the times I actually go looking for "help."

They're probably worried about the $7.8 billion from CHIPS showing up without a bunch of nonsense from the Whitehouse. Letting the date slide out a bit to make sure they can still finish without outside $ is a pretty smart move given the current political climate.

I would imagine a fairly sizeable portion of that billion will be spent on blow. Did I say blow? I meant "local community investment."

Unless you're using the energy from the windmill to actively sequester carbon, you are not "earning back" any carbon, which is what the alternative energy is trying to save. Spending less carbon per unit of energy produced as compared to something like coal production is not a bad thing, but it's spending less it's not "earning back" no matter how hard you try to greenwash it.

Getting too far ahead of technology is an understatement. My car is 4 years old and has collision detection warning, and I can enable autobraking as well. It's pure garbage. By the time it detects a real situation I've already braked, or steered clear. Much of the time it can't detect any issue. Sometimes it decides to trigger on things that aren't a problem at all. So yes, maybe in 20 years we can advance the tech enough to slap $50-$100k worth of detectors, sensors, and avoidance systems to make it work. I'm pretty sure it was a feel-good rule either never really meant to last, or meant to try and force out private vehicle ownership for anyone not super rich.

Before T got elected there was a bunch of bad noise about trying to break them up. This sort of move positions them to be able to quickly divest if/when the political and regulatory climate shifts.

Tuktok is blocking general access based on geolocation. You can still go to the website and login to download your data but can't otherwise use the service without jumping through a non-US proxy.

If the SKU doesn't support TPM it won't work without using some ugly (and unsupported) registry hacks. So while it may be possible to get around the TPM issue for now, that might not continue to work in the future.