Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Breaking news (Score 1) 167

No, it doesn't save you money but it gives you far better quality control.

Yup, And I didn't mention my sausage, made with top quality pork loin, instead of "floor sweepings" and whatever else was left over at the slaughterhouse.

Or my pulled pork, which is smoked and cooked similarly to brisket. Wife has some magic sauce she puts on it as well.

And there are the Brisket tacos... 8^P All these do make for a day of work to do, but it makes for many weeks of good food afterwards.

Comment Re:Breaking news (Score 1) 167

Producing all your own food is a second job and it likely won't save you any money. As you allude to, you will likely be eating better quality food but are unlikely to be saving any money. You also need the land to do this with, which most people don't.

I'm not saying people shouldn't have gardens, etc, but industry scale really does make things more efficient, likely at the cost of quality.

No argument there, it all depends on what value a person places on taste and quality. When I stated doing my own canning, it recaptured the taste of my childhood. We were poor, but turns out we were "foodies" long before it became popular.

Comment Re:Breaking news (Score 2) 167

The one thing I know is more expensive is the oil pack Hungarian wax peppers are seriously more expensive. But not many do them other than myself and a lot of the Italians in my town. I'd be curious to hear if anyone else does this.

I've not fired up my pressure canner in way too long...this pepper thing sounds VERY interesting....

Got any links?

https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbloominthyme.com%2Frecip....

For sanitation, we have to have everything super clean, because we don't use pressure canning. I usually use one, but like peppers to have a little bit of crispness left I do two things different from the recipe. I put sprigs of thyme in the jar - 3 of them. A lot of people use oregano, but thyme has important antibiotic properties.

I also use around 2 good sized cloves of garlic in each. For antibiotic reasons as well as flavor

Slice the peppers into rings, then salt them down a bit and press the water out with weight overnight. Pack the jars to maybe at least an inch from the top. with the time and garlic. Get them stuffed in there - Oil is expensive. Have the boiled lids ready - be sure to wipe the rims off.

Place them in the water bath with the hot water. I pre-heat my cans on the stove first. When the water returns to the boil, 6 to 10 minutes. It isn't a long time, which is why the thyme and garlic are critical.

People should do a can or two at a time, then finish them off in a reasonable amount to time.

These things are heaven on hoagies, and wife and I drizzle a bit of the oil on Nachos as well. Or I have them on crackers.

Comment Re:There is no such thing (Score 1) 167

as "plant based meat".

I could make a claim that there is "plant based meat", it's called beef.

I recall someone pointing out how bear meat can taste different based on the time of year it is harvested as bears will eat more berries in warm weather and more fish in cold weather. This is the difference between "plant based meat" and "meat based meat".

Their scat can look a lot different too. I was in Alaska on a hike some years ago, and there was a lot of salmonberries ripe. Turned the bear crap a nice shade of purple. The woman guiding us said we could help by eating as many along the path as we could, since the bears wouldn't be as likely go to where the berries were already eaten.

Comment Re:Breaking news (Score 1) 167

I agree but there are some forms which really can only be pretend meat i.e. the burger in a bun. I've been vegetarian for over 40 years and I like to I cook, mostly from raw ingredients - almost no pre-prepared stuff except noodles or pasta. Plant patties are the only meat substitute I occasionally buy because it's nice to eat a burger with onion, tomato, relish etc.

True dat. Meat doesn't own the patty shape I eat falafel burgers. They don't even pretend to be meat, but are pretty yummy as long as not overspiced.

Hmm, a falafel burger with relish! Sounds good.

Anyhow, I tried facto-ovarian vegetarianism once, I did it by the book, but my physiology did not like it at all. So I do eat meat again, and although it took a while to feel better, I'm apparently one of those people that can't handle not eating meat.

Comment Re:Breaking news (Score 1) 167

But why do we need to pretend with meat substitutes?

Before meat substitutes, a lot of vegans/vegetarians would put a fsckton of spices in their food. maybe mistaking craving for meat as the need to make their food way overly spiced.

All said, I do enjoy an occasional veggie burger if it isn't one of those overspiced abominations.

But I also put real bacon on it. I make a lot of home made bacon - just what a veggie burger needs.

People need to be able to experience what food really tastes like or bad things can happen to their health.

Humans are omnivores, only kooks would think otherwise. We are predators, and not prey. Evolving as omnivores, our physiology expects the nutriments it is designed for.

Comment Re:Breaking news (Score 1) 167

Sorry you are wrong. There are not "thousands of delicious traditional recipes made entirely using vegetables and no meat."

Food tastes different to different people and it is an actual, provable physical difference, not just personal desires. And I am not just talking about cilantro.

This is quite true. I try not to judge people based on what they say testes good or not. They obviously know what they like or don't.

The cilantro thing is one of those genetic things. To me, it tastes like Ivory soap. A little in something, and I find it inedible.

The problem is this: there are real, physical differences between human taste buds. It is NOT merely psychological.

Absolutely. My sister in law likes Potatoes, Corn, Hamburgers and chicken. That's it. Brother in law likes some variety, so we invite him over often to have lunch.

Those people need to eat vegetables, but they will not eat the bitter crap you like because they can taste things you do not.

Note, if I were a chef, I would label my recipees as Supertaster approved or not.

There are some other physiological differences as well. I tried a vegetarian diet back in the 1980's. Supposed to be healthier. It wrecked me.I felt bloated all the time. Bowel movements got all messed up. Felt like crap. I tried to persevere for like six months because after all the vegans and vegetarians claim it is so much healthier. Finally I quit and went back to a human proper diet. I felt better quickly, but still took months before my system returned to regularity.

Turns out that despite the claims, not everyone can be a vegetarian, and definitely not a vegan.

Mark Vonnegut (son of writer Kurt Vonnegut) had actual psychotic breaks from a vegan diet. He wore an interesting book called "The Eden Express" with some interesting stuff in it.

Comment Re:Breaking news (Score 1) 167

Generally, anything done at home is cheaper than buying it on the open market.

For reasons that are kind of obvious.

SO and I can food at home. I'm not certain about it being cheaper, if it is. We just carry on the legacy of my parents, who canned food because they had to.

Cheaper, or more expensive isn't my metric - it just tastes so much better than store bought.

The one thing I know is more expensive is the oil pack Hungarian wax peppers are seriously more expensive. But not many do them other than myself and a lot of the Italians in my town. I'd be curious to hear if anyone else does this.

Comment Re:Options are the Problem, Not the Goal (Score 0) 167

Hope you don't think this is pushy but raising cattle uses far more resources than plants. So a plant based burger would be more sustainable, efficient etc. We don't see this as a lower price yet because, reasons, I don't know, maybe it's still in the early adopter stage/too soon. I don't mind eating meat but the last beyond meat burger I had at a pub tasted better than their meat ones! So I'm positive about the option.

This is not a problem of too many cows - it is a problem of too many people. It is going to take a long time to turn humans from omnivores into eating a prey diet.

I too like a lot of pretend meat patties. I do have them with my homemade bacon on them! 8^)

They have one issue that I am concerned about - phytoestrogen overload. Soybeans, and Peas, two of the usual ingredients are loaded with them. Not good for men because it alters the hormone balance, may be related to low sperm count, and not good for women because their natural estrogen shuts down.

So my beloved veggie burgers are eaten in moderation.

Comment Re: Random thoughts (Score 1) 234

Check the date of the cpu release not the date you think you got it, sure you purchased a notebook 5 years ago but was it on sale as old model and shipped with win 10 or even 8? Cheap is rarely better "poor man mans twice"

It was 1500 dollars, so not the bottom of the barrel.

I even accept it as my fault, mainly because Microsoft must have had a very good reason for not supporting that processor. All that said - I prefer using computers where unknown things aren't my fault. So - what is your solution? How am I supposed to know what the standards are before they are out? Any thoughts?

Comment Re:Random thoughts (Score 1) 234

The difference is that Apple produce both the hardware and the OS. They provide a well understood support lifecycle for both.

> Exactly - and that is a really good thing.

A manufacturer of random hardware which bundles a given version of windows with it has no control over microsoft's support lifecycles.

Exactly. I remember a time when the many configurations on Windows was a bragging point, how Windows users had this amazing widespread number of choices. as opposed to Apple's meager offerings. Well - there was the so called "hackintosh". Bot that's pretty irrelevant, more a challenge than a practical solution

So what was once a flex is now almost lamenting that the Windows hardware ecosystem is random and uncontrollable. The OS is almost completely disconnected from the hardware.

Comment Re:Random thoughts (Score 1) 234

If you bought the laptop 5 years ago and is unsupported it means it has hardware from at least 3-4 years prior to that. So you got screwed by the vendor.

There's some funky math going on though - When W11 first came out, it was 2 years old. Nice fast laptop but Windows says NO!

Perhaps I should have spent months researching data that well - wasn't there when I bought the computer. Hella thing being acceptable collateral damage.

Comment Re:Random thoughts (Score 1) 234

I have a 5 year old decent laptop that is not eligible for Windows 11.

Your laptop will run Linux just fine.

Yup, I installed Mint on it as dual boot, and it runs it well.

If you bought a Microsoft branded device in the past 5 years it will be eligible for Windows 11.

When I ran the software to test the system, it suggests otherwise. My issue isn't TPM, it appears to be processor related.

There's no guarantee for the hardware you bought to be supported by a 3rd party vendor (Microsoft) for any length of time. Again, there's no legal basis to tie 3rd parties into some support obligation.

Windows 10 has a 2 year support period. Always has. Every single version. It was always up to the user to manage the software and alternatives are available to you.

I don't actually disagree with you - the onus is on me, always has been, and always will be.

That being said, the onus to get me to part with my money is on the companies wanting to sell me stuff. So my decision is to run with the company where I don't make those mistakes.

And you know, The "All your problems are your fault and your fault only" that Microsoft - and by extension you - have, I can remember this treatment, and then I can remember that Apple gave me a sweet trade in of several hundred dollars for my old Intel Mac, once I had a mouse go bad, and they overnighted me one from California overnight, free - the only thing was they wanted the old mouse back to do a Q and A on it. They assigned a dedicated helper to help fix a headset problem because of my hearing issues. I made a comment on their support page and was called in a few minutes when I wasn't expecting it.

Meanwhile Microsoft has simply given up on any problems I've had for basic support, like my copy of W11 pro that won't authenticate, even though it is a legit copy bought directly from Microsoft, they have the sales record, I have the receipts. My fault as well I suppose. Yup, It is on me, but I do understand the difference between a company that helps, and one that tosses customers out with the bathwater, and tells them it is their fault. I know how that problem can be fixed, by not giving them my money.

Comment Re:what is the value? (Score 2) 29

What is the value of removing all humans from the loop?

There are a lot of advantages:

  • Time to deployment. A drone can take off now. A piloted helicopter likely requires someone to drive to the helipad from home or whatever.
  • Time in air. A drone never gets tired. It can stay up continuously until it runs out of fuel, stop for refueling, and take off again immediately. A pilot needs sleep, and there are only so many of them available.
  • Number of simultaneous craft. Because you aren't dependent on having enough pilots, you don't have any limit on the number of craft other than their cost.
  • Number of simultaneous craft in the operational area. Because the craft can pilot themselves using radar and dozens of cameras and whatever else, you can fly them closer together without worrying about the pilot's reflexes being fast enough to avoid a collision. And if you do have a collision, you don't kill anyone.
  • Better accuracy because of ability to take greater risks. If no human would die, you can get closer to the fire to hit it more accurately if needed.
  • Ability to do a continuous bucket brigade. Because you aren't limited by the number of pilots, even if you end up needing human pilots for the actual firefighting, you could still have fully autonomous helicopters doing all of the mundane flying back and forth to get water, and you could have them lined up a hundred feet apart for however many miles it is to the nearest reservoir, providing a literal continuous supply of water that would be completely unachievable with human pilots.
  • Reduced weight potentially means slightly more water capacity, assuming you don't end up using up all of that saved weight with the extra automation hardware.
  • Drones could potentially stay in the air 24x7 in small quantities to detect fires, and put them out before they become big.

There are probably other advantages.

Slashdot Top Deals

CChheecckk yyoouurr dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh..

Working...