A world without Trump voters? Sign me up! Sounds like paradise! Only smart people allowed. Imagine a world in which 85 IQ persons simply did not exist. Collegial doesn't even begin to describe it.
It's not about "starve", they'll be allowed to live out their natural lifespans. One generation and out.
The whole purpose of trigger warnings is to advise people who already know that they have psychological triggers that can cause an uncontrollable cascade of emotions. It's not to keep the queasy from tossing their cookies. It gives empowered individuals (like those with properly diagnosed PTSD) the information they need to use that power.
How gullible are you, and how gullible do you think I am, or anyone else?
They've been screaming for decades that 1.5C is the panic point, and 2.0C is right out. There's your tenths.
Damn, munged the link: https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2F...
Kushner has been doing this kind of work in the Middle East since before Trump became President. Hell, before he even married into the family.
Bullshit. Citation needed. He dealt (poorly) in NYC real estate, just like his future father-in-law. From
For much of his career, Kushner worked as a real-estate investor in New York City, especially through the family business Kushner Companies. He took over the company after his father, Charles Kushner, was convicted for 18 criminal charges
His "investment firm" was just a bribe for pulling the rug over Saudi Arabia's crown prince kidnapping, killing, and dismembering a journalist that was critical of him while Kushner was in the first Trump administration. Kushner never did any venture capital investing, but it didn't stop the Saudis from giving him billions of dollars.
From the same article:
Since leaving the White House, Kushner founded Affinity Partners, a private equity firm that derives most of its funds from the Saudi government's sovereign wealth fund.
So both of the buyers are the Saudi PIF, it's just one of them has a level of misdirection.
They claim they can predict the global temperature in 75 years within a tenth of a degree. How much more accuracy do they need?
Answer: they don't, unless their models are so inaccurate that the claims of knowing the temperature 75 years from now are false.
They lie.
Cattle in Greenland is historical fact. I learned it in grade school and a simple google finds all the confirmation you need.
The 97% fallacy is also easy to verify.
You lie again.
Again: rebut my assertions and claims, or you are a fraud. If all you do is skirt the issue and claim to be right and I am wrong, without any evidence but the sound of your keyboard, you are a fraud.
Explain where I have confused climate and weather. You didn't, and you won't, because you can't. You make arguments with nothing to back them up because you don't know what you are talking about, and because you don't want to risk anyone rebutting your claims.
That's also why you didn't rebut a single one of my claims. You don't believe your own claims. You are just another climate alarmist yelling at the clouds and wearing an onion on your belt.
Your faux-concern is so touching -- and fake, as you well know.
I'm glad you at least recognize you treat people as stereotypes instead of pondering what they say and responding as if you had actually read and understood what they say. You may eventually cease to be a stereotype yourself some day.
Artificial intelligence has the same relation to intelligence as artificial flowers have to flowers. -- David Parnas