They make up data to justify their positions, then tell everyone about their insane made up numbers to justify the legislative policy they want to achieve.

Here is my problem with "manga piracy".

No one is buying pirated manga. What people are doing are reading manga online that has been translated by 3rd party translaters, BECAUSE NO ONE ELSE HAS TRANSLATED THEM.

When it's a no-name manga that the western world doesn't know about, no one gives a shit about copyright for that manga, because no one is really reading it except. But when hundreds of thousands of people are suddenly interested in that manga, because it's been translated into english by 3rd party translators, suddenly it's popular.

There is one company that goes around and, only after a manga / manwha becomes popular due to scanlators, buys up the license and then sends a C&D to the translator. Then the translator stops translating them and the shitty company puts the manga behind a paywall and uses machine translation for the translation after that point and uses the original translators translations for the old stuff.

Now the readers are all fucked because their manga was dropped and the only way to read shitty machine-translations is behind a paywall.

Isn't the entire point of the article evidence?

I seem to recall that the prosecutor was trying to make an example out of Aaron was was going for MULTIPLE consecutive sentences of 6 months with a realistic imprisonment of 15+ years.

I'm getting pretty tired of companies offering "Services" or "licensing" for physical items that are for mass consumer purchase.

What's next, Nike requiring you to pay a monthly fee to buy a shirt?

This has been known for a while now...

And surprise! Youtube is completely opaque on how it handles takedown notices, despite facilitating and allowing fake DMCA takedown extortion rackets to fleece it's creators.

All the Hasbro CEO cares about is higher profit margins. He gets a lot of pushback against AI from the WotC crew who refuse to allow any of it in D&D or MTG.

You do realize that your premise has been thoroughly debunked and that your interpretation is completely made up?

Which is why if you asked Alexa for reasons NOT to vote trump, it would give a list.

Error = bullshit.

Or... not quite done with but destroy prematurely.

Didn't they let a suspect of an investigation willingly and knowingly destroy evidence, and then give them immunity after the fact?

Don't know why you're labeled troll and not insightful...

No, what SCOTUS doesn't like is federal agencies passing policy as if it had the weight of law. Thus bypassing congress's ability to legislate.

Federal Agencies like to exercise their bureaucratic power by redefining things, altering definitions, etc, to increase their scope of authority by casting a wider net. Thus granting themselves more authority than they actually have. THAT is what SCOTUS has been stripping away from federal agencies.

All of this is maintenance that should have been done but has been put off.

EVEN IF all of the power lines in CA were upgraded, we still don't have enough power generation to charge a quarter of the proposed amount of EV's.

People who make comparisons between MAGA (or anything, really) and Nazi's are idiots who call everything they disagree with as "nazi like".