Wait, I am confused. Are you talking about spotify or the hackers?

Wait, I am confused. Are you talking about spotify or the hackers?

The word you're looking for is "retribution".

D'oh! Willie Sutton, not Willie Horton!
Anyhow, I stick by Leslie Fish's answer.

But, no. It's Leslie Fish who has the answer:
Robbing the Poor

The burden of proof continues to shift to the accused?
Clearly the state's evidence was faulty and the tools they're using are suspect.

The only reason this person was not unjustly dragged into court and very likely
coerced to plead guilty to a crime they did not commit
  was that they paid for and submitted to constant surveillance.

Or in this case, harm reduction.

Sounds like he's realized the climate is screwed and we are completely incapable of thinking far enough ahead to do anything about it.
As the effects of climate change continue to appear, we can address them on a case-by-case basis...if those effects directly involve anything we care about right now.

Meanwhile we should forget about fixing the root cause and apply our efforts where they might have some effect.

My employer already knows whether i am in the office or wfh.
Most other jobs seem like they would as well.

Recording over time and later studying the actual prices from the real-world subject (Amazon) would be in situ.
Relying on self-reported info from that same clearly biased subject is just an unreliable study.

"C.AI argued that because her son signed up for the service at the age of 15, it bound her to the platform's terms"
Seems like they just admitted there is no contract.

The world we've built is built for our shape -- bipedal, upright. While specialist shapes can be useful in limited circumstances, a bipedal human-shaped robot would be adaptable to the world that already exists.

In the end, the auto maker took his domain name.
Wait not in the end actually I just checked it he got the domain back but only after he died.

Not necessary. I could clearly hear Gene Wilder's voice as I read it.

It doesn't, actually. The official description from the IEC says:

Emphasis mine. The standard test for IPX7 is submersion in still water to a depth of 1 meter for 30 minutes. IPX8 is "better than that". Apple, Google, Samsung, etc. all define how much better on their own. CNBC has an excellent video explainer on what exactly all this means.

These companies are designing to protect against people dropping their phone in the toilet, or maybe a kiddie pool. And yeah, as called out in the CNBC video, the advertising is very deceptive and unfair.

Alfalfa and Spanky had the he-man woman-hater's club. We have these two atrocities.
bleah.