Comment AI robots? (Score 1) 6
Well, we will see when the first one kills somebody. Because AI is not suitable to implement machinery safety.
Well, we will see when the first one kills somebody. Because AI is not suitable to implement machinery safety.
It is really amazing how completely without insight you are and how completely without the ability to actually understand text.
Thanks. Apparently the person you answered to cannot read.
There is really nothing else to add.
Replacing real intelligence with Artificial Idiots is such a great idea. As usual, this is just about making things cheaper and crappier.
But the crapto-bros are not rational.
No "kinda" in there. This is full-on stupid on an advanced level.
It is a no-brainer. This approach gets taught in software security courses (at least in mine, but I would expect most/all others do it as well). The problem is people writing security critical code that have no clue about software security. That is cheap, but does not work and cannot work.
And down here in the sane world, what would actually happen is a mark on LiFePo and then, say, 5...10 years, after that has been established and all new ones sold have that, flying with one that does not have the mark will get restricted or not be allowed anymore.
There is really no sane reason for your hysterics.
Everybody is potentially violent. It is human nature. Most people need significant provocation to get violent, but everybody can do it if the situation is right. And that is exactly what "potentially violent" means.
That does not mean that everybody is a threat to others that have not threatened them. Now, "prone to violence" is an entirely different thing, even if still fuzzily defined.
Indeed. And that is why a "safe space" for character assassination is unacceptable.
What is wrong with you? I am merely pointing out how people behave. You are the "hysterical" one here.
WTF are you talking about?
And what if you are just flinging crap in the hopes some may stick?
That is hugely problematic. First, everybody (including every woman) is "potentially violent". Second, if it gets easy to make accusations and those accused have no recourse against false accusations, many accusations will be false. This is why we have "innocent until proven guilty". This is not a luxury, it is necessary because too many people are willing to lie.
The "cutting edge" is getting rather dull. -- Andy Purshottam