Looks like both bookworm and trixie are fixed as of about 3am UTC last night.
Sync your mirrors if it's off cycle. Luckily mine sync around 9am, hopefully the buildbots were busy..
For bookworm you need 8.2.35-1~deb12u1 .
Thank you, Guilhem.
Oh, did they have a warrant signed by a judge?
Illegal searches can be resisted.
Of course you risk being murdered for your rights.
Which appears to be the cost now.
They shouldn't want us to know that; bad chess.
They've gone from being infamous for offering no support to pretending to offer support?
I guess it will help people who haven't yet tried everything on their own before they figure out there is no support.
Happy to be proven wrong and learn that the chatbots are empowered to fix things.
They did things like this at the end of Rome.
P.T. Barnumus.
They can easily be downloading and using it locally/airgapped to get an open weights and measures system.
But that's the problem - an organization as big as the DC regime needs to control what its agents think to maintain discipline.
Marc Andreesen spoke about this when the Biden admin told him to not invest in AI startups because they wouldn't be allowed.
Controlling the Big Three is much more manageable but with hundreds you can't maintain an effective hivemind.
What's good for the country isn't usually what's good for the government.
Buzz has spoken on more than one occasion about a radio source and a structure on Phobos that is being kept hush-hush.
Then he stopped talking about it and won't say why when asked.
"I got bad information from a dope playing a practical joke on me" would have been easy.
Maybe Japan will show something interesting. Maybe the probe will mysteriously fail at an inopportune time.
I'll be glad to see the question resolved if it can be.
Mysteries are fun but discoveries are more interesting.
They might pick-and-place here ro fool the regulators and politicians.
Truly a kakistocracy.
He's right, you know, but the demand is self-feeding.
It's necessary to have more successful non-MBA companies outcompete the race-to-the-bottom companies.
We need better social systems to punish the psychopathic impulse. It needs to be more profitable to not exploit people.
I've lost track of how many companies I'm boycotting but most people don"t have time to think abour that.
Making contracts where you lease/rent a game illegal just removes choices/products for everyone on the market
Making motor vehicles without safety features illegal also removes choices/products.
the risk of making them (perpetually maintaining game servers, or giving away massive amounts of IP) were too intimidating to embark upon the project.
Multiplayer video games ought to be designed up front for private servers after end of support, in the same way that motor vehicles are designed up front for the safety of occupants of that vehicle, occupants of other vehicles, and pedestrians.
A choice becomes a Hobson's choice when all sellers in the relevant market choose not to offer an option to buyers, such as an option to run a private server after end of support. A Hobson's choice is no real choice.
Forcing the companies to support old game will just cause them to no longer make the games or go out of business.
If the publisher of a single-player or small-group multiplayer game can't make a useful subset of the server software available to licensees, they should go out of business.
If I pay for a movie ticket do I own the movie?
That's advertised up front as the equivalent of a rental. I draw a sharp contrast with buttons labeled "buy" that do not grant equivalent rights to those of the owner of a lawfully made copy.
You've never "owned" media.
Per the copyright statute of Slashdot's home country, Title 17, United States Code:
- A copy is a physical object in which a work is fixed. (Section 101)
- It is not an infringement for the owner of such an object to resell that copy. (Section 109)
- And it is not an infringement for the owner of such an object to make another copy of a computer program in RAM as an essential step of running it. (Section 117)
If the publisher of a movie or video game refuses to make it available in physical copies, am I justified in pretending that the work was never released?
Game companies don't always fully own all of the server tech that runs the game. Some or all of it could be licensed and not redistributable.
If it becomes a crime or tort for the server middleware publisher to provide middleware that is "licensed and not redistributable", server middleware publishers will have to either change their standard license terms going forward or close.
Until you realize that to keep up with what your friends are playing, you need the equivalent of Netflix, Disney+, Hulu, Paramount+, HBO Max, Peacock, and a bunch of other services. Netflix streaming began as the online extension of Starz, and now Starz is its own separate subscription service.
Companies that sell control systems with proprietary software running on Windows could distribute their software running on Wine/OpenBSD as an appliance without reengineering the application.
Windows updates/hardware abandonment etc. are real headaches while control systems ought to be secure.
GPL virality has many vendors scared of linux appliances, warranted or not.
The person who can smile when something goes wrong has thought of someone to blame it on.
