Comment Re:Compared to doing what? (Score 1) 876
Substinence farming or starving?
Well, subsistence farming, but yeah, you have about the right idea.
Substinence farming or starving?
Well, subsistence farming, but yeah, you have about the right idea.
So far, only Apple seems to be remotely close.
And that's because Apple is starting to do things MS did a while back. Can you honestly not see the signs? Apple fanboys conveniently look past the horrible shortcomings of their demi-god and continue to root for it solely because it is not Microsoft.
Metamaterials are interesting enough _whithout_ that stupid invisibility shit everytime.
I mean, lenses without diffration limit are also interesting. And opposed to the inisibility stuff, they might really work.
Is it lonely up there on your pedestal?
Until they stop supporting your current OS with security upgrades and activation.
...how is that a compelling reason to start using Windows 7 or Vista? You can just move to Linux or Mac OS, which, with enough tinkering, will do nearly everything XP does. Your logic, sir, is faulty. To throw my hat in this ring, I've been using Vista for a long time and I have had very few problems with it. If you know what you're doing (if many of the critics are any indication, this is a huge problem), have a good antivirus program (which you should regardless of which OS you're running), and tailor it to meet your system's capabilities (my laptop can run everything just fine but I decided to turn off Aero and some other features because I value speed), then Vista is great. If, on the other hand, you dig in your heels and howl like a little bitch about Vista not being XP, you are not going to get very much done.
Secondly, the issue here isn't whether or not breastfeeding is allowed in public. It's whether or not Facebook has the right to censor photos of breastfeeding mothers. Aside from the fact that none of the young mothers *I* know would be caught dead posting breastfeeding pictures on Facebook (Seriously? What the HELL are you thinking? It's the Internet. Would you post a basic shot of just your tits on it? No? Then what convinces you that it's better to have a baby in the picture that just so happens to be hanging out near said tits?), the fact remains that Facebook has the right to remove content at its sole discretion. Like it or lump it, that fact remains.
As for your final point, I don't think there's a Christian church in the world who would disagree with you that Jesus did, in fact, suckle happily away at the Virgin Teat. Were you just flaming, or are you actually stupid enough to think that people believe otherwise?
P.S. As I mentioned before, please check your spelling of "mammal." Also for your consideration: "argument," "asinine," "let's," and "self-righteous."
It has just been discovered that research causes cancer in rats.