Make the fine for paying ransomware 3x any ransom paid. If a company is really set one paying the ransom, it will come with a much higher price, and use that money to fight cybercrime and protect infrastructure.
If you found a company -- any company -- not just in tech, you probably put in a lot more than 40 hours a week, especially for the first few years. But the founders also expect to reap large rewards for that hard work. They are "all in". The same is not true for the average employee. They don't stand to reap a large reward if the company is successful. They could get fired at any moment. It's unrealistic to ask for that much time and dedication without the same reward potential. Some companies do stock options that let employees share in potential gains, but that's not true for most employees.
Companies refuse, time and time again, to train employees in the skills they value, and shift blame back on employees.
They are trying to invent digital cocaine.
It's the hard-to-remove bloatware and background processes that make older PCs slow on Windows 11. A PC that worked reasonably well on Windows 7 with a HDD is painfully slow with Windows 11, for very little end-user benefit. I wish MS would release a bloatware-free SKU of Windows 11 that would run on Windows 7 hardware.
This. Most people have no respect for copyright anymore because of the ludicrous terms. The bargain that is copyright was protection for a relatively short time. If something really sparked my imagination as a child, I could write a derivative work as a young adult. Now it would be more like my great grand children.
A long time ago I read that around the time Linux was getting started, the BSD/UNIX wars were putting a legal cloud around any BSD derivative. IIRC, Linux started a year or two before FreeBSD. This gave Linux an early first-mover advantage, which proves to be quite important. I would also say the Linux had a bit more desktop/multi-media support, which helped adoption. FreeBSD also had low-cost competition from Wind River or something like that, that had a BSD derivative.
Oracle was just one more company to use Linux, to most people. It was Google, Amazon, Facebook, and many other internet 1.0 companies that were household names and "Tech-darlings" that gave it credibility and associated it with innovative start-up culture. Oracle was more of a me-too. Linux was a huge behind-the-scenes part of the internet boom.
That's my point exactly. The developers would demand better "Development systems / IDEs, compilers, database engines, and so on". They would spend that time they are waiting for compiles to finish devising better development toolchains and writing tighter code. The exact specs I mention are just an example, but the least they could do is test on more realistic spec'd machines.
I grew up in the 640k RAM DOS days. It forced people to write tight code. Constraints force people to be frugal. Look at how great the Norton Utilities for DOS were.
As long as developers keep getting the fastest computers, with much more resources than the average consumer PC, programs will be bloated. If you gave all programmers I3's with 8GB of RAM, you would see a massive reduction in code bloat and a huge increase in efficiency -- but at the cost of developer time. They are simply not feeling the pain that normal people with average or older computers feel.
I was thinking about getting a new cell phone but was perplexed by the choices. With Motorola phones off the table, it makes the decision easier. Perplexity is already making my life better and I've never even used it!
In practice, failures in system development, like unemployment in Russia, happens a lot despite official propaganda to the contrary. -- Paul Licker
