We can and have observed quantum spooky action at a distance at sufficient remove (entanglement apparatus synched between the ISS and the opposite side of the Earth) to confirm that states remain in synch outside of the entangled particles' light cone.

At the moment, this can only be used to know specific random remote information, and thus is not useful for communication in practical terms. Could someone eventually work out a way to coerce entangled particles into a meaningful behaviour pattern though? Not yet, but this is hardly a mature field.

It's just going to tell them we're living in a statistical approximation of a universe, isn't it?

If only there were some tool they could use to push their changes to Github.

Furthermore, Midnight and Noon should actually be in the middle of the day & night, regardless of the date. Standard Time is truth.

I mean, we've directly observed light being bent by gravity at every opportunity, and measured the slight-but-as-predicted time & mass dilation between Earth's surface and the ISS speeding by at .000027c. Some details remain opaque to us sure, and there is definitely more to the story than we know but the broad strokes consistently match the universe around us better than anything else.

I'd say the better mirrorless eyepiece viewfinders are there now. They're low-enough latency to satisfy action/sports shooters, detailed-enough for macro & bird people to get their focus right, and the ability to see not only the framing but exposure and color that the camera is actually recording is a huge benefit.

Canon's EOS-1V RS did this also. It allowed extremely high frame/second rates for a film camera, since the shutter requires less movement than a mirror does.

The full-frame R-bodies let you switch to APS-C cropped mode when mounting EF-S lenses via the EF->RF adapter, if you're wanting to ease into full-frame without replacing all your lenses at once. APS-C mode resolution is roughly FullFrameResolution/2.56, still plenty of pixels.

We have similar native orb beavers here in MO. They are beautiful to be honest. They're a bit of a nuisance it you're going hiking while they're active, since they love to spin their huge webs across the gaps between trees that trails provide.

I once woke up to find one had built a web across the sliding door to my apartment's balcony. I let her have the balcony for the couple weeks she lived and took tons of close-up photos through the glass. Amazing stuff.

I don't know enough about the gas facility target to judge its validity as a target. If it is a piece of energy or fuel infrastructure supporting the invasion though (Nogir is within a day's drive of Rostov-on-Don or Sebastopol), sabotaging it is more guerilla warfare or spec ops than it is terrorism. Anonymous engaging in sabotage like this rather than goofing around harassing Klansman or Scientologists is astonishing though. "For great justice!" takes on new meaning when they're slowing down Belorussian rail systems carrying fuel, tanks, etc. to the front.

It's really not that different from how the gear ratio on a bicycle lets you go faster than your feet are moving as you turn the pedals.

The TV should be infrastructure for all the shorter-lived featureful devices. I want it to look good, be reliable, and otherwise not make me think about it. I can replace an obsolete older Roku/AppleTV/FireStick/whatever multiple times for a fraction of what a big TV costs.

F-35's cost six to seven times what a Reaper does, and their cost per flight-hour is TEN TIMES that of a Reaper.

I'm not aware of a US drone outfitted with interceptor role missiles like Sidewinders or AMRAAM. Such a thing could be done though.

Could a hotshot pilot in a latest-generation superiority fighter defeat even half his plane's cost in dedicated interceptor drones?

How many replacements for the dead pilot are available?

This exact phenomenon is one of the two things taxi commissions were established to prevent, the other being unsafe drivers/vehicles.

While they also tend to be regulatory capture targets for local cartels looking to stifle competition, that doesn't make their stated purpose a lie.

I wonder if they're going to bust every recording studio and concert venue in the state as well, because ain't no studio Sound Engineer or Front of House Engineer passed the exam. They might - MIGHT - be members of the Audio Engineering Society, but most are not. The AES is mostly academics and Electrical Engineers who work for manufacturers. The most successful might be members of the National Academy of Recording Arts and Sciences, but most are not.

The terms are a hold over from the days when audio production systems were mostly one-off custom installs designed and maintained by the facility's Engineer, but everyone still uses them. Terms like "recordist" have been floated as alternatives, but have not gained traction.