Texas Instruments

You do know that the Apple hardware devices still work, they aren't given a remote kill command, and could just be logged into with another user account?

Issue us, the hardware still works (its not bricked), and software is typically sold "as a service" and not a physical object so there is nothing to refund legally.

Dev thank Apple by making apps for their devices which in turn gives customers reason to buy Apple devices. The issue here is that Apple demands dev to prostrate themselves in front of Apple. These are not the same.

And yes, developers do pay for these things, no one is demanding it for free. Apple deems it's worth $99 a year for the tools, as well as the purchase of there devices. This is the fee they demand all people have to pay to make apps regardless if it has payments or not, it's on their website.

I'm not sure where to start with this train wreck of a reaponse...

Blantly copying others isn't revolutionary, no matter how hard you want it to be.

Windows 10 was on ARM in 2017, Ubuntu first supported it in 2009. MacOS started using ARM in 2020. I'm not talking about things like Raspberry Pi. I'm also not going into other Linux distros having already supported ARM. These would be some of the major alternatives to macOS which were already using ARM years before Apple.

"power comparable (not to mention better) than any PC mobile-class chip were absolutely new when they made the switch." Where the hell did this come from? I was talking about how others were using ARM years before Apple. This has nothing to do with anything. Your benchmarking comments is just as off topic, we arent talking about x86-64. Small jumps in specs aren't revolutionary when they are using the same common architecture as everyone else has already been using/supporting.

ARM is an acronym, an it stands for "Advance RISC Machines", though the A originally stood for Acorn. So yes, it would be capitalized.

I'm not even going to bother with the rest of your rambling, which most is just repeating what was already quickly disproven.

You entire post reply is lazy, bad, sad, and some of the worst trolling I've seen in years here on Slashdot. Try harder next time.

That would be like saying when Apple switched from PowerPC to Intel CPU is was revolutionary. Switching CPU architecture to a different common CPU architecture isn't what I'd call "revolutionary".

ARM chips weren't new when they made the switch, other desktop OSes were already running on ARM by that point. Now, if they had suddenly come out with MacOS on something new like a quantum CPU, then we'd be talking.

I can find any that will be supported for longer though. Macs on average are supported for 7-8 years.

You think people complaining about Windows 10 computers were "only" supported for 10+ years will end up being perfectly fine when they realize that Apple supports their devices for years less?

Too bad Apple didn't with China and caved in.

If someone is dressed up in a Batman suit, more people will assume that it's being recorded and will also more likely be posted online. If they will be recorded and posted online, then people will "behave" better for fear of repercussions.

It's like that old study about what was the ideal lighting that will get workers to work harder. In the end, it wasn't the lighting that made them work harder, it was the constant monitoring that was known that their bosses would see that made them work harder.

According to the link you posted, Device support (patches) has little to do with it. It was only for 13% of people.

"What Are the Main Reasons for Replacing a Smartphone?
According to Joint Research Centre (JRC) research, aesthetic obsolescence is the primary (47%) reason to upgrade a device. Trends in the industry are evolving quickly, causing devices to go out of style.

The second most common (40%) reason to change a smartphone to the newer option is technical obsolescence. These devices don't fit consumer needs due to poor performance or breakages. Although some of them are too old to be repaired, the lifespan of the majority of these devices can be prolonged.

The least widespread (13%) reason is functional obsolescence. Usually, that happens with very old smartphone models that are incompatible with the latest updates of operating systems or appsâ€"for example, Apple maintains a list of obsolete and vintage smartphones that tracks such models."

Use KDE Connect.

https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fkdeconnect.kde.org%2Fdownload.html

It allows you to send any file wirelessly from any device to any device. Android to iPhone, iPhone to Linux, Windows to Windows, etc...

These are normal in the EU. You end up either asking someone who works there to open the gate or until someone else leaves.
They aren't fun, but aren't new either.

Choice is great and I highly encourage it. But there is no choice here, it's Apple's way or nothing.

Some are ok, most seem though to have lost their meaning though to me.
The Safari icon looks less professional, a little too "flat" and small.
The Image Playground is terrible either way.
Photo Booth now looks like it's for printing images, I would never have guessed it's true usage.
Automator looks like no one knew what it was for, and decided to make it some retro-futuristic 60's TV. At least a full robot kinda made sense.
The Calendar lost it's meaning. I get that it's a calendar but changing it to a list of dots just makes it lose meaning.
Font book now looks like it's the address book app.
Disk Utility now looks like it's supposed to fix the entire system (OS issues, etc...), not just storage space.
Image Capture looks like it's for downloading images from the internet, not from devices.

And so on...

They were being used just for IOS app development. You can't build for IOS without using Macs.