You're making the same mistake the AI bros make, making the entire argument about money.

"If you aren't making the same slop everyone else is making, only on roblox, then you're missing the gravy train." Which is the same idea the AI slop makers are doing to youtube, and to tiktok, and so forth.

Like for every game concept you find on roblox, you can likely find the game it was stolen/inspired from was some popular friendslop game that was released months before it. I'll give you the most obvious example. Do you know how many "Among Us" clones exist? There are literal clones (eg duck duck goose) available on the same platforms Among Us is on, there are clones within Fortnite, there are clones within Roblox, there are clones within VRChat, there are clones anywhere that lets you do UGC within the game engine.

That's just how things work, especially if you misprice the game. You are not going to make a gritty Call of Duty game within a UGC system because those require complicated systems that you're not going to replicate, with or without AI. But you're also not going to recoup your costs if you let an AI generate something that on the surface looks like COD either.

The two ways games get mis-priced are:
- Asking for an entrance fee to play a multiplayer game. If it costs money to buy the game and the core game loop is simple, then it's never going to be popular, people will just rip it off and make it in VRChat, or Roblox, or a Minecraft mod, or whatever. The correct price for a game with multiplayer is 0$, recoup the costs some other way.
- Gating cosmetic gear behind P2W/Gambling mechanics. This is the appeal of VRChat and Roblox, and also Fortnite. You can customize your avatar, often with crap found/won in free activities. Sure Fortnite definitely has a lot of shovelware tier cosmetics. But it has it. VRChat people just steal things from other games, often wholesale (eg pokemon), but I'm also going to point out that a good 90% of VRChat worlds are "coded" as ERP (Erotic Role Play), and how do you know that? If you see a mirror in a "bed" room, it's an ERP world. I don't know if the same is true in Roblox, it's just too damn ugly, and I've seen Roblox since it's initial slow-ass physics-sandbox lego-clone it was originally. There is no working around that.

The "Okay grandma" arguement, okay fine, but my point is not that I think the game is ugly, it's that I know it's the same argument as "mobile games are not real games", which are heavily gacha-oriented or loaded with ads for a "free" experience, and not real games to me. They are portable slots machines. Roblox and Fortnite to me follow the same "the user is a money pinata, see how much you can nickel and dime them before they quit and take their friends."

I personally hate lootbox/gacha mechanics, but I'll also groan and still play such a game while avoiding that mechanic if the stuff is optional, not necessary to play the game, and not attached directly to a hand-in-your-wallet mechanic (Eg if the game requires you to have a credit card on file, just stay the heck away.)

I hope Unity and Google eventually realize people hate AI slop, and doing all these slop-enabling AI things is just going to erode the trust in the actual market.

Right now this is pushing people to support indie games that proudly say they don't use generative AI assets. Unity has picked losers before, and I expect Unity and Unreal to eventually have to dial back some of their investments in generative AI slop because it risks people abandoning the platform.

And no, Roblox is not a serious gaming platform. All Roblox is, is a bunch of stolen game concepts made into a common ugly avatar platform.

This is just license politics, FSF's policy is GNU is the only valid license, anything that is not GNU should be illegal. Including BSD/MIT/Apache, Public Domain, and various kinds of Creative Commons licences.

FSF is okay if they are advocating for open source, but their true beliefs is a lot like PETA (where their belief is nobody should own an animal and it's better to euthanize a healthy animal than to let someone adopt it.)

At any rate I'd hope that FSF steps away from trying to force everyone to adopt GPL, when clearly other open source licenses work better for different projects. The entire "the entire OS must be GPL" is one of the reasons why Linux is still not adopted instead of windows, because you're not going to find 90% of the tools you need in the GPL ecosystem.

AGI to me was always "Adventure Game Interpreter", eg the 1980's sierra game engine.

When the generative AI techbros started calling their slop generators "AGI" I was like "... great now the slop is drown out information on game development history."

ALPR works fine if it's used the way it was intended to be used. Dragnetting and using it as a lazy way to track a suspect that hasn't actually done anything is not what it was meant for.

What it was meant for:
a. Traffic Management (eg congestion control)
b. Parking Enforcement
c. Traffic Control (preventing unauthorized vehicles from entering, eg bus areas)
d. Toll plazas
e. Law Enforcement/Customs signals (eg a specific suspect driving this vehicle needs to be detained ASAP)

Everything else? Get a court order. Drag-net fishing expeditions is the worst use of this technology. If someone has not done something wrong, you don't go out of your way to find something they've done wrong.

To that end, there really isn't a proper use for Flock cameras. They are designed as dragnets. The proper place for these are in redlight traffic cameras that are installed in the traffic management system itself, and the cameras should only be recording and discarding license plates based on violations within the cameras view. Flock does not do this, it's just arbitrarily stuck somewhere where there is a high perceived level of crime and then used to stalk targets who haven't actually committed a crime. If a city wants to use these, they should be be on the main highways in and out of the city, and then rely on redlight cameras on secondary routes. You want to know if a vehicle is within the city still, that's about the extent of dragnetting that should be permitted because that allows Amber-alerts to be narrowed down to specific locations instead of state-wide nuisance alerts.

The drum machine and synthesizers did not replace drummers and real instruments.

In the long run, wavetable synthesis and MIDI did, but only to open the possible options because most instruments are difficult to make in the first place. If you can build a synthesis keyboard that can play every instrument correctly, albeit without the fine analog control of a human, that means "anyone" can play the same music that sounds the same every time. This is why orchestras still exist. Orchestras always sound better than pre-recorded music, but to enjoy you you have to actually BE in the orchestra's audience. There is no way to hear and feel that.

It's the same with theatrical plays versus watching something on blueray/dvd/VHS/film. You do not get the experience of being there. The parts that make it human.

You can argue that computer generated special effects, scenery are better than practical ones, in SOME cases they are when it would put the performers or audience in harms way (example "the phantom of the opera" not only has fireballs, but has a chandelier drop on the audience that is on a cable so that it doesn't actually hit the audience.) You can only do that practical effect in a real theatre. Not only that, there is a risk in the real theatre of being "too close" to these practical effects for comfort. In a small theatre Phantom of the Opera can't do most of these practical effects, so they... use a computer to project those effects.

This is how I see "AI" shaping out in the end. That it brings the ability for people to create works to more people, particularly in locations where the software or people are impossibly priced out of the market. That said, the cost to use "cloud" AI products is far more than paying humans and buying the software that you'd normally make music, animation, television and film with. You will never be able to produce an entire video game, television show or film with the AI we have now because there is no way to maintain a context window longer than a few seconds. This is why so many "AI Slop" things are short incoherent videos. When it comes to music, so far all AI does is "re-autotune" a signer, or predict the next "sound" of a song. It doesn't create anything, so all you can do with AI generated music is create derivatives of existing works. It takes a human to write music. Always. Even algorithm, procedurally driven music (eg portal) ultimately has a human behind it.

This is why people who promote AI, sound like snake oil salesmen. They keep promoting AI to replace human labor or human creativity, but fail to mention that it requires creativity to understand why something IS or IS NOT creative. Many of the AI-slop loving people only use it for making hate/cyberbullying material, because for that stuff to work on it's target it only requires evoking an emotion in the person who sees it. It doesn't require understanding.

Homework has never been a productive use of the students time. If you are at school, you should be learning there. If you are at home you should be socializing with your family or friends.

Like think about it for 5 seconds. Why are people so angry now. Why are people addicted to social media? Because they have not learned boundaries.

If students are spending all their waking time doing homework for 8 different classes, with teachers who don't talk to each other to talk about homework load, you're going to have students who either A: don't do it or B: copy someone elses work.

How is using AI any different from copying their friends homework.

My guess is that it was probably just whatever was available. If the storage on the device survived they could figure out what actually is on it.

I've watched this guy on several videos. He isn't saying anything that tech folks don't know. We know this is an asset bubble, the AI hyperscalers are going to collapse, the companies left holding the bag will be Oracle, who is just rent-seeking, and all the others building data centers are rent-seeking.

Like the fact that some of these places are just burning natural gas like there is no tomorrow shows a fundamental flaw in their plans. All it takes is one backhoe 10 miles from the data center to "oops" the gas line and that entire hyperscaler is offline for a day. Or a drone that accidently hits the substation or switchyard. Why is there not a single solar panel on top of these things? These places are going to be a conflaguration in the banking should a fire break out and there's no staff to try and stop it.

If we expect to have a space industry for the next 20 years, we need to urgently get back to reusable launch vehicles. I'm not saying we need to go quite as far as the NASA space shuttle, but we need to get reusability of large vehicles to get the next space station or even build larger orbital space stations or spacecraft.

But ultimately some kind of space catapult/electrically launched vehicle/space-plane is the final form of this. We know "technically" we can push a jet high enough that a space craft could then be launched from to have the first stage be a completely reusable by landing it right after the vehicle unmounts from the launch vehicle.

Sorry, both Musk and Altman are scammers. "Full Self Driving" F off with that, I would not trust anything Musk says after 2018 over the "pedo guy" cave rescue crap. That's when I knew Musk as a joke. He's always been a scammer going right back to Paypal.

Altman, oh good god, watch any biopic/documentary on the guy, and he is just so full of it. This is literately a guy who uses his own chatbot for everything. There is a reason why the most viral "sora AI" videos were of Altman stealing GPU's from stores.

People misunderstand the problem with PFAS.

PFAS is a chemical class used to bind Teflon to Metal. That's why metal has a "scratch" surface because teflon won't stick to metal either unless the surface is roughed up first. PFAS could be recycled if the manufactures wanted to, but they don't. Just like anything else, it's cheaper to dump it the water than to recover it.

That is where 99.99% of the PFAS problem is.

PFAS in food, is barely a thing. It's not coming from food, it's coming from water contamination. The only way it ends up in food is when you overheat your teflon pan OR you scratch it and the coating starts coming off. It's that point you should probably discard it. That's why people's pet birds die when you use teflon pans incorrectly while cooking.

So while I think the setting PFAS limits is a good idea, but the reality is that the teflon scare is already out there. People are not buying it anymore. They are now switching to titanium or back to cast iron. Cast Iron is probably better to for you since if it leeches anything it's iron, which you need anyway. Back in the 90's people threw out their aluminum pots because of it's connection to dementia, and threw out their pyrex dishes because they "Explode" because the company that owns the Pyrex brand doesn't actually make "pyrex" anymore. Like I swear to god that pots and pans are things you should never have to replace, but any time you've had to replace them it's because the handles fall off from metal fatigue.

The thing is, it's very hard to make electronics this small, as the current processes are basically still "lithography" techniques. A technique that goes back to etching acid into rock. Modern chip lithography evolved from photo lithography, the technique used to etch circuit boards.

The ability to "draw" at sub-millimeter (1000 micron) requires using a light spectrum laser with a wave length small enough. So EULV is literately "extreme ultra violet" 13.5nm, which is basically x-ray wavelengths. Yes you heard that "x-ray laser", or known as the "SX" (Soft X-ray) spectrum which ends at 10nm. X-rays literately eject the electrons of atoms. This is why "10nm" has often been the described as the wall for die shrinks. You can't get any smaller because you're then having to figure out how to do things at atom-level. Which is what the article basically describes.

The smaller things are, the more errors that will happen when your materials aren't perfect. Like the next chips might not be "lithographic" processes at all and might have to be a form of "3D printing" at atomic-level manipulation. Which at this point probably isn't viable from cost levels alone. If we stuck around the current named "5nm" process (is actually a 24-36nm spacing process with a transistor pitch of 42-57) So compare that with the above of 9nm spacing and 15 atom pitch. So yes, in theory that is a 3 times smaller transistor than current "5nm" process.

But also look at what I just said, you need an EULV process for that, which means the laser has to be 2 times finer than than the spacing. Everyone's "2nm" or "18Angstrom" process is still within the same numbers as that 5nm process node.

The thing is, paper checks are more secure in two specific scenarios:
- Transferring a large amount of money between two businesses with no prior relationship (Keep in mind that this is primarily a problem with US small businesses)
- Transferring any amount to a foreign individual. Because all the f**king banks want to keep like 30% of it. Even Western Union wants to keep like 10% of it.

So the best way to make sure the intermediatory isn't eating the funds up in fees is to make sure you get the check in the hands of the person it's supposed to get to. PayPal is the single WORST way to transfer money. And has always been the case, but have become worse in the last decade and refuse to do international payments unless you hand over like 30% of the money. Even then the receiver can't withdraw it even if it's in USD, because Paypal just refuses to do so.

So that is where we are internationally. Between people in the same country? That's a solved issue of which the US is still pretty much dead last, next to north korea. Australia is the leader here, because you can just arbitrarily send money to someone with their deposit-only number. But as I said already, "in country" is a solved thing, it's the cross-border transactions that currently have too many layers of fee-takers.

Apple is the canary in the coal mine.

If Apple can't absorb the price hikes on RAM and NVMe drives, then that means nobody can, which means Microsoft, Sony, Samsung, Broadcom, NVidia, AMD, etc are going to raise prices if they have not already and also lose a lot of sales revenue.

This is the deathkneel on consumer electronics that can be blamed entirely the AI data centers.