Fuck royalties and braindead encryption on HDMI, but I recall nothing bad about Displayport.

And some bright managers at M$ decided that's a luxury one cannot have with windows 11.

So, no, thank you.

EVs sell "well" in China, as one needs 1+ year in most populated places in China to get permission to drive an ICE car.

Of all EV manufacturers, even though heavily subsidized, only one, BYD was profitable.

So "free marketplace", my bottom.

RAG is not "training" anything, but rather creates a helper DB with your "additional content" and bunch of limitations attached.
It is absolutely not the same as being trained on that dataset.

This looks more like wishful thinking from Huang, rather than actual business.

His stock went down after recent earnings call, the next gen AI chip has issues, even before a possible perfect storm (AMD MI300x and what comes after it), NV is at 70% of AI market, with big flashy "fuck you, Huang" from juggernauts like Apple, who have opted for Googles specialized chips.

Wrong. Two years ago is when ChatGPT 3.5 was released and major public just started getting taste of what LLM is.

At this point hundreds of billions are poured into "AI" with majority of projects not only not having anything in production, but even not seeing any concrete path to it.

Unless a new LLM like breakthrough (it has surprised even its developers) happens and suddenly all that chipery becomes useful, this madness will crash.

AMD ensured that all major AI related frameworks (e.g. pyTorch) run natively on its hardware.

Welp, a couple of days ago I recall the first time in my life trying bing after google.

I've searched something rather basic, regarding next football match of a certain nation.

A lot of search nowadays goes straight to ChatGPT.

Google's dominance is no longer as solid and untouchable as it seemed.

There is an army of fields in which humanity is trying to "address gender gaps" if one of the genders is underrepresented.

How is "what about any other field, did it succeed?" not relevant a question?

Women in symphonic orchestra? Blind audition working? Nope, not and ? Oh, ok.

I'm pretty sure I've seen an article trumpeting "finally with blind audition discrimination will end and we'll have more women".

Is it a good time to accept that not all gender gaps are caused by soem sort of discrimination, or do we need a few more decades of DEI bazinga?

I know for a fact that that isn't true

There are solid findings from evolutionary psychology field that you cannot negate by some laughable anecdote.

The findings are rather peculiar:

1) Women, unlike men, are very focused on finding partner that is AT LEAST on their level (looks, education, income)
2) The higher the status of a woman, the stronger the demands

ok, this one is not:

3) Women do care a lot about males ability to get and committment to provide resources

as what else would we expect from a society that spent 99.999% of its history as species as hunters-gatherers.

This is about what people WANT mind you. Many might want to bang Amy Adams. Barely anyone will.

reason to force women to have lower standards?

Lower what?

Happiness is in steady decline from 70s.
Unhappiness is steady raise form 80s.

On the bright side: gender gap in happiness is shrinking. Female happiness is neraly down to male happiness now.

Punching boys as called out in Christina Sommer's "War Against Boys" back in 90s might have something to do with it.

% of women in STEM fields in Sweden is DROPPING, contrary to what emapncipation was supposed to bring.

Universities in Iran are mostly not segregated, back to your "but maybe that is why" argument which isn't an argument at all.

STEM in general often involves working with other people

Sure, Joh. Perelman, Einstein, Newton, Fermi, were a bunch of amazing extroverts that made their breakthrough in a drunk male only parties out there somewhere.

It is whack a mole game with, on one side, a bunch of dubious thoughts and on the other, cough, facts.

Socializing means JACK SHIT in math and STEM in general.
We know it for a fact.
We have goddemn math genius Perelman, who was bullied for his entire life and still ives with his mother.

We have countless hackers who are lonely dudes in the basement, with no friends and just computers around them.

Yet women are somehow underrepresented in that area too, even though nobody could possibly know what sort of genitalia does j99qq4at possess.

The mystical male conspiracy that keeps women away from STEM somehow works even in environments that everything is anonymous, there is no personal contact whatsoever and where nobody reveals own gender.

This book manifests the level of female entitlement that exists in human heads, it is simply insane.

Someone with some farma background here.

We test FEMALE ONLY drugs in this very order:

1) Mice
2) Dogs
3) Chimps
4) Men (male homo sapience)
5) Women

Why? Because if it KILLS, government prefer it to be done to a men, over a women.

This fact is singled out in the book as being "sexist" towards... women.

"Probably". So let us have clearly discriminating policies because "probably" there is some male conspiracy going.

Saudi Arabia and Iran have higher % of women in STEM, than, couhg, Sweden.

Established narratives about the causes of gender gap are laghably off.