Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Simper Reason - Covid PCs Are Aging Out... (Score 1) 40

[looks at my 2009 Mac Pro I bought used in 2011 for $300, still going strong]

I have upgraded the 4 core Xeon for a 6 core, upgraded RAM to 64GB, replaced 512MB Nvidia with an 8GB AMD card, upgraded the blue tooth/wireless, replaced spinning disks with SSDs. So maybe an extra $400.

Still, $700 for 13 years use (mostly iTunes library and photo/backup duties) isn't too bad. It takes up a lot of room and I've been looking into repurposing the case for some fun project, now that Mac Minis are affordable. Actual daily use systems are Fedora on AMD pcs.

Comment Re:China still loses jobs, capacity (Score 1) 30

It also means the manufacturing capacity belongs to India or Vietnam, rather than China, despite China having nominal control of the output.

This is the part that drives me crazy about the "anti" side of onshoring/reshoring. "Oh, it'll be an automated factory that only has a dozen jobs at most, that's stupid." Maybe so, but at some point you have to realize that "but then we have the factory, not some at least nominally hostile government 10,000 miles away" has value on its own. Hell, if nothing else, the massive disruptions of supply chains during Covid should have taught people that.

Comment Re:enshitification (Score 1) 104

It's an industry ripe for innovation, and I suspect we will see a new player come along (probably self-driving cars?) that will be better and wipe them all out

For short routes (something like Nashville to Atlanta) you'd win on time but almost certainly lose on cost.

For long routes, for example New York to Los Angeles, you'll lose on both cost and time. I also suspect that, say, New York to London might have some additional challenges for a self driving car... how do you suppose a Tesla Model 3 handles in 40' seas in the North Atlantic?

Comment Re:True but irrelevant (Score 1) 124

He's obviously talking about the Fourth Geneva Convention given the date, and your response has nothing at all to do with the refutation of "nuclear weapons being criminally illegal [in 1945]."

And, since you're trotting out Nuremberg, here is what General Telford Taylor, Chief Counsel for War Crimes at the Nuremberg Trials, had to say about strategic bombing:

If the first badly bombed cities — Warsaw, Rotterdam, Belgrade, and London — suffered at the hands of the Germans and not the Allies, nonetheless the ruins of German and Japanese cities were the results not of reprisal but of deliberate policy, and bore witness that aerial bombardment of cities and factories has become a recognized part of modern warfare as carried out by all nations

Slashdot Top Deals

User hostile.

Working...