So, like Q-ctrl

When I had a battery door on my phone, I had more than one battery, and an independent battery charger. The charger could charge my battery slowly and massage it, so it retained the best battery life. If I'm paying someone to change my battery, why not pay them to install a kit so I have a charger, a couple of batteries and a battery door on my phone?

I looked up what federal permits you might be talking about, and the ones I found are all about protecting the environment. But, environmental protection has already been defunded, hasn't it?

When they start using it to charge you for Excel by the document, I bet it won't count low.

I guess C-x M-c M-butterfly has been taken. Why not most effective way to program?

If Google's AI tried to call every number it encounters online, I think the number making all the unsolicited calls would quickly be blacklisted and reported to do-not-call lists and sites.

CEOs who don't want to spend money on security infrastructure express agreement with state sponsored hackers: "It's no problem. There's no new threats." Researchers are having arguments among themselves: "was that AI, or just someone unhinged?" "Was that AI, or just someone kind of dim but really thorough?" "was that AI or...?"

They also invented OLED display and sold it to LG. Everything I've heard about Kodak management makes them sound like people who regret they couldn't get jobs at AIG instead of someplace that actually manufactures a physical product.

Regardless of how seriously they take the abuse, they respond with alacrity when the complaining entity can afford lots of attorneys and is known for using them. The RIAA doesn't have trouble with take-downs.

Here's a link from the BBC story about this project. India and Bangladesh, who are downstream, are unsurprisingly less thrilled.

When you get Fox News and conservative influencers behind your non-partisan issue, let me know. I credit them for half of the unhappiness and four fifths of the thinking that Trump was the answer to it.

So, you need 27. The list of states without two Republican Senators that haven't yet voted on it are: AZ, CA, CO, HI, IL, ME, MI, MN, NM, NV, OR, WA, WI States with two Republican Senators that previously approved it are: KY, NC, SC. I could see KY and SC voting to overturn their previous vote if it looked close. States without two Republican Senators that previously voted against it are: CT, DE, GA, MA. I don't see GA overturning their previous vote, and CT and MA are both small states with > 3 billionaires per million people. Alaska does ranked choice voting, and Nebraska does proportional electors, so they might try something different. Good luck getting to 27.

If you put something pyrophoric inside and top it off with argon, you can apply a bottle cap and have a glass bottle whose contents ignite on exposure to the air.

An amendment isn't necessary. The current size of the house of representatives is set by The Reapportionment Act of 1929 and previously by The Apportionment Act of 1911. Both are federal laws passed by congress and can be overridden by another federal law passed by congress. The Penrose Method has been proposed as a better way of determining the size of the House of Representatives and would bring the number of representatives up to almost 4 times the current number. It could be put into place by a simple act of congress. I'm certainly not saying the odds of that are good, but they're better than for passing a constitutional amendment. And, once the House of Representatives gets bigger, I doubt it will vote itself smaller afterwards.

I wish they made Sailfish compatible phones with the radio for Band 71 in USA.