Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:50/50 (Score 1) 188

Learn to not make mistakes the same way musicians do. Practise as slowly as you have to to not make mistakes. Then slowly speed up, while remaining intolerant of mistakes. Also as an exercise, one I heard about from my Mum when she was taught professionally, was playing music with a clear pulse, and typing in time with the music: either one correct key per beat, or zero. But not more, and no mistakes. But treat typing as a discipline akin to playing the piano or some other musical instrument.

Comment Rather than 'touch type or not', think efficiency (Score 2) 188

For those learning touch typing, especially self taught, take the attitude that there is far more than just typing without looking, and using particular fingers to press particular keys.

The overall aim is to type: quickly, accurately, with minimal effort, and with good ergonomics.
As for what you type, for many tasks, it is useful to have your eyesight free to look at other things.
(It is similar with, say, the piano where if you want to read chords, lyrics, or sheet music while playing,
then you need to be able to play without looking at your hands.)
Having your eyesight free for other things is one of the reasons to touch type, consider reading
something out of a textbook, and how much harder it is to type what you see if you have to keep
looking back and forth between your hands, the source text and/or the screen.

Then, thinking old school, professional typists had to be able to type accurately. One single character
wrong, and they can probably get away with tipex and retyping it, but that takes a comparative age
compared to not making the mistake in the first place and going a little slower. (I write this as someone
who was self-taught, and wish I'd drilled accuracy into my technique way earlier.) Especially if
coding, not making typos is important. So learning not to make them is important. And as a suggestion,
consider how a pianist learns to press the right keys in the right order without making a mistake.
Treat accuracy in typing as just as important as accuracy when playing a musical instrument.
The trick is to go as slowly as you have to, to ensure correctness, and then only speed up when
you can do things correctly. If you go faster than that, you rush, you make errors, and then you learn
to make more errors, and to be tolerant of errors. Tolerance of errors is how errors creep in.

But going back to what I said: efficiency, accuracy, speed, effortlessness, and ergonomics.
Those are your real priorities, and they are often well-served by learning touch typing properly.

Comment Re:meanwhile... (Score 3, Insightful) 240

The trouble is that AI plagiarising is kind of like money laundering. You can't take the output of an AI and work out what went in, in general, an more than you can take the output of a hash function and determine the input that produced it. Reaching the bar necessary to win a lawsuit is probably impractical, and the AI companies and their expensive teams of lawyers know this.

Comment Re:Is this bad? (Score 2) 240

Killing the AI industry in its current form _worldwide_ would be a good thing. A big reset and rethink, kind of like reining in the nuclear arms race. Killing the AI industry in the UK only, while it remaining a free-for-all elsewhere is economic harakiri. If the UK bans it, but some other country doesn't, then companies will simply go set up shop in that other country, do all the creative output mining where it's legal, and then sell whatever they can to whomever they can. They make money, the UK doesn't. Basically creatives are being thrown under a bus, there's little a minnow like the UK can do about it acting on its own.

Comment Re:Tribalism (Score 1) 166

Once civilisation started, we started helping each other survive on an industrial scale. People who would normally fail to reproduce now manage to. So survival of the fittest lost its cutting edge. So we've hardly evolved since pre-civilisation. Hence our biological instincts are oriented towards living in small isolated tribes. And as a culture we're collapsing back to that pre-civilisation psychology. In previous generations, hardship motivated us to work together, and religion played a role to. We've got rid of both of those and not replaced them with a functional equivalent.

Comment Analogies (Score 5, Interesting) 45

Since you can get a taxi, you don't need to walk. So why bother walking?
Since you can buy ready meals in the supermarket, you don't need a cooker, only a microwave, and don't need to learn to cook. So why bother learning cooking?
And why bother lifting weights in the gym if you can make a machine to do the work for you?

The biggest benefit of learning to code is how it trains your brain.

Comment The Immediate Gratification Generation (Score 3, Insightful) 110

We live in a time where people are lack the patience to take the time to learn something.
The result is dumbed down interfaces which are inefficient to use for those who are willing to take the time to learn something.
Next they'll insist that pianos need to have their keys replaced by a play button so that everybody has the same opportunity to make pleasing tunes with the instrument.

Slashdot Top Deals

Top Ten Things Overheard At The ANSI C Draft Committee Meetings: (3) Ha, ha, I can't believe they're actually going to adopt this sucker.

Working...