An endeavor with net zero value, turns out to be difficult and will require years of work to produce a worthwhile experience. During which time, the newer hardware will again not work with it.
This fails to at all address the idea of what games those linux users are playing. If the linux users are playing casual games and/or 10-year-old AAA games, it does nothing to validate linux as a viable gaming platform.
Am I the only one who thinks that if you changed the color of the last "e" in the new logo that it would look exactly like the old Internet Explorer logo?
People tend to forget that Microsoft wasn't ALLOWED to innovate in some areas after the anti-trust trial.
Microsoft was not allowed to integrate certain software and services into their OS. They had to code them as completely separate products without direct interaction. While they still had these shackles on, Apple and Google were free to meld ANYTHING they wanted into their core products.
Seems to me that Google has built a business that is too cumbersome to maintain legally? I mean just because no one was bothering them about it previously doesnt mean tthey dont have the legal obligation to do it.
It's as if I started a landscaping business and I was dumping all the waste products in my back yard. When I run out of space and have to pay for garbage removal...it means that my business is flawed....not that they should write laws to allow me to dump it anywhere.