It seems that the flagging is handled differently depending on the respective professor or software platform used.

Some students will be more disadvantaged than others, as is usually the case with highly standardized education solutions.

1. I'm not OP
2. Why would Fox run something credible? They appeal to short-term emotion, not long-form data
3. You still haven't demonstrated that under-reporting of certain credible stories isn't an issue in the mainstream media
4. I'm not sure what point you are trying to make in this thread

The New York Post was banned from Twitter for a full week for reporting on the Hunter Biden story, which was backed up by award-winning progressives/whistleblowers including Glenn Greenwald and Chris Hedges.

It's easy to laugh at sensational conservative reporting, but let's not downplay a very real issue: partisan suppression of leaks and the sensationalizing of stories. Just because a story doesn't serve your political interest doesn't mean it warrants suppression. Just because a leak is dropped by a foreign adversary at an inopportune time doesn't make its contents irrelevant.

If you have the knowledge to contest misinformation, than do so. I'm not that smart, but I know that petty attacks widen our social divides.

Anyone who is critically-minded about the possibilities of state interference, dark patterns, the post office, and social media censorship knows that vote manipulation and misinformation campaigning are likely happening on all different scales, for both candidates. When you tell the entire population that the vote will be 100% democratic, and it's not, it's not surprising that some of them buy into insane conspiracies and run with them.

I built 9-foot-tall monolith out of wood once. I put it in my school woods and, to the best of my knowledge, it's still there