Erm.. those scumbag leaders didn't *do* what they did because they were atheist.
They did what they did because of political power and stupid ideology.
There isn't some kind of universal atheist you know. There's no instruction manual like a bible (hah!).
All an atheist is, is someone who has decided that there is nowhere near enough evidence (ie none usually) to believe silly superstitions.
So that make you a nice shiny bigot yourself there.
"We call a man a bigot or a slave of dogma because he is a thinker who has thought thoroughly and to a definite end."
-Gilbert Keith Chesterton
Oh yeah - and making someone chose jesus over their family is a pretty divisive thing to do - obviously nowhere near the level of violence and hatred show in the older parts of the bible though it's true.
"Google made android NOT to lock people into Android but to avoid being locked out of "
Agreed.
Google also seem, to me at least, to be starting to make using their products 'slightly' less refined on any other device to Android devices.
Everything works, just not quite as nicely...
Yet again even if this is true, which I haven't seen proven, why would you justify mutilating millions of babies to reduce the incidence of STDs when they are adults?
Except this is not a valid medical reason.
*IF* these studies were reliable, repeated and valid science, then you would possibly have an argument for circumcision *in the countries where running water/cleanliness was a problem*.
Does that really sound like the US to you?
So, sorry, but this is still mutilation of a huge number of boys, who are not going to be helped by this.