Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Am I the only one excited? (Score 1) 201

I am excited. I still hate Gates and Ballmer, I used to hate Microsoft. I still love Linux and open source. I admire and respect Satya Nadella and Phil Spencer so much so that I now admire and respect Microsoft and Xbox. I can't wait to be able play all the games of Activision-Blizzard on Game Pass for free.

Comment Re:First Bethesda... (Score 1) 201

This statement is mostly false. Ensemble Studios as well as Lionhead Studios were indeed closed by Microsoft. The other studios you mentioned as well as many others that Microsoft purchased are alive and flourishing and continue to develop games. Studios such as Arkane, Ninja Theory, Obsidian, InXile, and Double Fine have avoided the danger of closing down due to the lack of income after they were purchased by Microsoft. They are flourishing and growing as well and continue to make games.

Comment Re:Blizzard Activision were already gone (Score 1) 201

You can call a lot of executives as soulless. I doubt you can say that about Satya Nadella. Please look him up and read his book. Maybe it is his culture, religion, or upbringing that allows him to have compassion for people.

By its very nature, a corporation is soulless but please refrain from lumping every single person who works in a soulless corporation as soulless.

Comment Re:Microsoft? let the layoffs begin (Score 1) 201

The only acquisition that was killed during the Satya Nadella era was Mixer. Microsoft invested heavily in the company paying millions to streamers and influencers such as Ninja and Shroud and they never grew significantly even during the pandemic, despite being given independence and autonomy, aside from boatloads of money. In the end, it was their toxic work environment which MS frowned upon, plus their lack of growth that ultimately did them in. Every other company that was purchased from the beginning of Nadella's tenure as CEO, has flourished and grown, with complete independence and autonomy while still relying on Microsoft's resources.

Comment Re:That's an odd purchase (Score 1) 201

The current output of Microsoft is to release two games a year. I think eventually they would like to release around 8 a year or 2 per quarter. For 2020, there were 250 PS4 games released that were noteworthy enough to be given a Metacritic score. In 2019, that number was 262. Right now, Microsoft's output is only 0.8% of the regular output of AA/AAA PS4 games. In the future, when Bethesda, Activision-Blizzard, and all of its game studios are churning out exclusives on a regular basis, their output could become 6.4% of the games regulary released on the Playstation platform. Can that be considered a monopoly? Does buying studios and releasing games prevent other platforms from releasing more games?

Comment Re:No (Score 2) 201

Microsoft offered to have all their exclusive games run natively on Sony and Nintendo platforms if they would allow Game Pass on their consoles. They obviously said no. Microsoft's end goal is not to be a monopoly on console hardware. They in fact wouldn't mind if Xbox hardware goes away so long as Game Pass thrives. Game Pass is essentially their platform now.

It would be impossible for Microsoft to be a monopoly in video games. In the future Xbox would like a release schedule of 2 games a quarter or 8 a year. For a publisher, that's a lot. Each publisher would like to release one or two games every year. The larger publishers can release two a year. Indie game publishers can do more. There were a 114 PS4 games released in 2021 that were noteworthy enough to receive a Metacritic score. 8 vs 114. Is that a monopoly? Future Xbox exclusive games would only be 7% of the current AA/AAA output of the Playstation. Right now, it's so much lesser.

Comment Re: This new MS no longer force feeds its culture (Score 3, Informative) 22

If you RTFA, under Satya Nadella, Microsoft has been making it a point not to infect, with its own culture, the culture of the companies that it acquires.

“It would be easy for a large organization to come in and say: ‘Hey, we’re going to show you how it’s done. We’re going to get you off this Java code. We’re going to get things moved over to C. We’re going to get you off Amazon Web Services and over to Azure,’” Booty told GamesIndustry.biz. “But it’s important to realize that the conditions that created Minecraft, how it came to be, are likely to be things that are difficult to recreate within a more corporate structure.”

Mojang was the first acquisition of Satya Nadella and his decision not to touch its culture, to not mess with the magic of what made Minecraft great, proved to be very successful and it served as a template for other acquisitions such as Linkedin, Nadella's second acquisition, and six game studios that were later acquired by Xbox Game Studios under Phil Spencer. This hands-off treatment of acquired companies has been the guiding principle for Phil Spencer (now head of Xbox overall) and Matt Booty (formerly Minecraft games business leader and now head of Xbox Game Studios) in giving their new game studios free reign in developing games with minimal meddling from Microsoft.

Their eventual shift of Minecraft to Azure from AWS may have been a practical as well as a financial decision, solely, by Mojang. Aside from the obvious discount that they get using Azure, they may have priority support from Azure, if not outright being given a dedicated cloud team that focuses on Minecraft.

Comment Re:Why not the Philippines? (Score 1) 130

the existence of a kidnap-for-ransom trade affecting wealthy foreigners in Manila is a legitimate reason for the Philippines to be perceived as dangerous.


Wealthy foreigners should never travel without bodyguards. They can be at risk anywhere, even in Central Park, New York, especially if they were walking by themselves. Foreigners would have no problem if they stick to the large malls or the relatively affluent places in Makati, Ortigas, Eastwood City, and Bonifacio Global City. They should always ask a security guard or doorman to call a cab for them. Security guards and doormen make it a point to write down the license plate of the taxis that pickup customers/clients in front of their establishment. Other than that, you can always call a cab company directly to send a taxi.

A simple rule in any country that you aren't familiar with is, just don't be in any area that you're not supposed to be. I remember me and my parents getting robbed in Romania because we were sightseeing at a national landmark at night where there seemed to be few people milling around. We were led to an even more deserted area where we were divested of our cash.

It's just common sense to be wary of your surroundings. My brother lived in the Bronx, New York and when I visited him there and I walked the streets during the day, I felt as safe as I would be walking the streets of Cubao during the day, i.e. I made sure I was aware of who was around me or who was following me.

If Google built a datacenter outside Manila, they might have to pay the NPA to avoid an attack, diba?


Another reason why Google can't build a datacenter in the Philippines. It would have to be outside Manila and that would present a security risk. If outside investors could setup their business in Makati, Bonifacio Global City, Eastwood City, or Ortigas Center, those would be pretty safe.

Slashdot Top Deals

Kiss your keyboard goodbye!

Working...