Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Misleading way to phrase this much? (Score 1) 216

"I also believed there was a reason the Democrats lost in teh previous general election" And what reason would that be ? Even wet poop should have won 90% of the votes against Trump if voters had a brain.

I'm not denying anything about Republican stupidity. Trump is a grifter, a stupid man who does however understand the art of the grift, telling people what they want to hear. They FAFOd. The Democrats were being equally stupid, just in a different direction while feigning superiority and following a group of far left misandrysts. I present to you the DNC produced "Men for Kamala" ads, which used Feminist stereoypes of White males, including a morbidly obese white male, bragging about eating carburetors for breakfast. protip: Not much uses carburetors any more, other than lawnmowers and small engines

And they were feigning the that Republicans were anti science, while they were riding the back end of the Trans movement, which ended up in stark denial of biology and science, to the point of not being able to tell the difference between man and women. Rejection of DNA and biology at a level that would be approved by ideology driven Soviet Union scientists and their Lysenkoism.

They supported schools aiding students who were transitioning, and allowing the schools to keep that fact that the students were transitioning a secret from the students parents. Note - this is not Trump's idiotic claims that Bobby can go to school Monday and come home as Tina, or whatever claim he made. The matter has been going back and forth for a while.

They largely declared males irrelevant, believing a blue estrogen wave would suffice, and with an undercurrent of #metoo stirring the pot.

They declared that the working class was not needed in person and bluntly, when Harris told the head of the Teamsters, that she was going to win with or without Union support.

Finally, they came to understand what the years of feminist attacks on males brought forth, the concept of male toxicity when ended up morphing into it's final form - that being male was in itself toxic. You may to my not agree, but they lost the young male vote, once quite reliably a liberal vote. I guess when you are told almost from birth that you are evil, you might not end up voting for that accusing demographic.

And the Republicans could point to documented evidence of all this, didn't have to even make shit up. All of this has been diagnosed by smarter people than I. Fortunately, it appears the insanity has calmed down. I believe that the Dems have learned their lesson. We've seen the results of following a half-wit President and his rubber stamping minions in power. Ain't good

Comment Re:We saw this with Enron (Score 2) 44

SpaceX is already Enron 2.0 * 1 million. I mentioned it before and I get modded down when I do but Patrick Boyle has a detailed video on YouTube explaining why SpaceX is just a scam to empty your retirement savings and your 401k.

There is 10 trillion dollars just sitting there waiting for the Epstein class to take it and they will be damned if they're going to let you keep that money. The same goals that bankrupted all the companies you grew up with using private equity and leveraged buyouts are now coming for your retirement. Even if you did everything right and saved your entire life you will be impoverished in your old age and work until you die.

Comment Re:We really should stop jerking Ukraine around (Score 4, Interesting) 74

Ah dude I don't know how to break this to you but no military drones used by Ukraine and the United States are not made in China.

Now the computer chips are made in South Korea and Taiwan and that's problematic. You should probably stop voting Republican because Biden was well on his way to getting Chip factories open in the states and Trump fucked that all up the way he fucks everything up because everything Trump touches dies.

Orange pedophile. I can say those two words and everybody here knows exactly who I'm talking about. Those two words are completely nonsensical together but they have an exact and specific meaning thanks to the American voters.

And if by some miracle you didn't vote for Trump and don't bother telling me if you didn't I don't care then you need to make trouble with your friends and family who did because 77 million people voted for Donald Trump but I have never met a trump voter in my life and I know a lot right wingers because libertarian bullshit attracts it people and the Republicans figured that out ages ago.

Comment Putin has the Epstein files (Score 1) 74

And the implicate Trump in pedophilia and child rape. They also implicate several other high-level Republicans in the same.

So we can't stop jerking Ukraine around until voters stop voting Republican. And voters don't seem terribly inclined to do that because trans girls in sports or violent video games or heavy metal records played backwards or furries or whatever the fuck is scaring the shit out of Grandpa and Grandma this week. I honestly don't know.

Comment Re:Misleading way to phrase this much? (Score 1) 216

Make all voting machine code public, or ban their use altogether if they refuse. Full audits of all machines. Ensure every state is required to use a valid form of ID to ensure legal citizens are casting votes. Ensure every vote is counted in public. In the Town Square if necessary. Twice.

If you actually accept all of these actions as lawful and necessary for the integrity of a nationwide election, then fucking dare tell me which political party would be bitching endlessly about these “unfair” practices. Because I can ensure you it would be only ONE party bitching. The cheating one.

And remember there is power in tend idea that if you convince a lot of people to hold the idea that voting in the US is corrupt if you lose, and fair and free is your party wins, and never ever ever conceded, who cares if there is absolutely no fraud? The paradigm just shifts.

And don't even deny that this has happened, and my bet if there is a shift in the midterms, it will happen again.

I live in a very liberal area. I go into the polling place, pull out my wallet and my voter registration and drivers license, they mark that I was voting on paper, and I fill out a paper ballot. How is that corrupt? And I mean it is those corrupt Democrats running the system.

What would a completely non corrupt 100 percent verifiable Republican system involve? And I hope you do know that the never-ending accusations of corruption is a wedge issue that is more valuable as a wedge issue than actually corrupt voting. You obviously is a Republican implements plan that no Republican will ever complain about. It's like abortion, rallying the faithful base is more important than actually eliminating it.

Looking forward to the infallible system you present, and it is a lot more than what you have said so far.

Comment Re:FAKE NEWS (Score 2) 42

That's over simplifying things a bit, but yeah, we have fundamental infrastructure issues in the UK with any proposed mass rollout of AI DCs.

What I see as an issue however, is the apparent paradigm that Data Centers, need all of the generated power - not just available, but all of it. And then need more. Here in teh states we're talking bout restarting old nuc plants to service the Data Centers. I don't see much introspection, just "Build more DCs, we need more power!" More nuc plants - they are green, so nothing can go wrong!" What I've heard and seen so far is there appears to be no limit, to the need.

Don't forget as Datacenters store more data, that there will be more data, which means more datacenter, to store more data - seems like infinity is in that equation,

Then again, this *could* just be Microsoft wriggling off the hook because they're starting to think the AI bubble might be somewhat overinflated and therefore they might not be needing all that capacity they've been saying they are going to build afterall, but don't want to start the stampede for the exits until they're already through the door.

And you might have just hit the nail directly on the head. I'm not particularly frightened of AI, but I can't be the only one that sees the current models as unsustainable. In another post, I compared the present Datacenter concept with the original tube based computers. We're acting as if current AI and its needs are already finished product. Just like I'm sure that the makers of those behemoth tube computers were.

This need for more power, more centers smacks of that. And it is a weird bubble, and as I noted, a lot of people much smarter than I probably are seeing that too.

Comment Welcome to the wonderful world of selection bias (Score 1) 241

The majority of people who have time out of their day to go to a protest because they're not working 90 hours a week driving Uber to try and scrape together rent money this week are baby boomers. So it is hardly a surprise that they're on the older side but they are also overwhelmingly female so you kind of left that out...

If you want to play games with demographics I'm game but you're not going to like the results.

Comment Re: Misleading way to phrase this much? (Score 2) 216

Itâ(TM)s less âoevoter registration,â and more âoevoter suppression.â By requiring a passport to register, which is neither easy to get nor free, Republicans are essentially asking for a poll tax, which is illegal. Which ignores the whole non-issue aspect, anyway. The percentage of voter fraud is less than 1%, so theyâ(TM)re trying to fix a problem that doesnâ(TM)t exist. But letâ(TM)s face it: Republicans merely want to cheat at elections so they stay in power.

Much of the cheating has already been shown to be Republican. If we look at the Arizona recount process years ago, they simply refused to accept that it wasn't cheating even after shown there wasn't enough to mean anything. Took the Vice Governor (IIRC) to say, the madness stops now. And Republican standard bearer Mike Lindell, the man who represents Republican ethics, ended up showing lines of code to prove the corruption that meant absolutely nothing, and even their hand selected expert refuted it. But Lindell still refused to accept it. In present day Republican Party, Lindell tried running for Governor, lost and still reused to accept the voter results in the primaries - this shows the Republican paradigm was to never accept the results if you lose, but embrace them when you win.

Comment Re:Misleading way to phrase this much? (Score 3) 216

If voter registration was such a non issue, then corrupt spineless Democrats would have non issues with supporting and passing the SAVE Act.

Go ahead. Dare ask why corrupt spineless Democrats don’t support it. You might find an answer before LA county stops proving why they don’t “need” more time than the entire country of India to ensure a Republican never wins in the Sanctuary state holding the most electoral votes in America.

One of the first things for you to know is I am an independent. I also believed there was a reason the Democrats lost in teh previous general election. I also believe that part of that was their own spinelessness. Here's where we are:

Republicans hold a majority in the House. Republicanshold a majority in the senate, Republicans hold the White House. Facts. Would you care to dispute those facts?

But okay - I'll accept your notions that elections in the USA are corrupt, and must be changed. Let's roll...

Illogical - I must then accept that the party that is the beneficiary of corrupt elections are in the majority, because otherwise, they would not be in the majority. They would be the plucky underdogs, making a valiant attempt to wrestle power away from the corrupt who are taking advantage of the process they implemented to keep them in power. The majority in power - and that tells us exactly who the corrupt are.Those in power. The people in power in a corrupt system are the prima facie evidence and hard to disprove the exact people that who use that corruption for their political power.

Unless you wish to argue that the corruption riddled US election system favors those not in power? That'd be pretty odd.

Do it - let's hear how the corruption is the Democrats, and it results in Republicans in power.

Schrödinger's Republican - Whenever a Republican candidate loses, it is prima facie proof that the elections are rigged and corrupt. When a Republican candidate wins, it is free and fair, and proof of the people's voice being heard through the democratic process.

Comment So a bunch of people went to an anti ice protest (Score 2, Insightful) 241

Some idiot fired a gun and it hit a cop. Several involved in the protest is now doing 50 years in jail.

None of them had anything to do with the shooting.

At this point if you oppose the administration and you make it known they can throw you in jail for the rest of your life and there is fuck all you can do about it. The only reason they aren't locking you up right now is because it's not worth the trouble.

Eventually if the Trump administration wins another election or two they won't need your vote anymore. That's the funny thing. Sure you might have locked me up in prison and or taken away my right to vote but what's going to happen to you when they don't need you to come to the polls anymore?

I have yet to meet a baby boomer who believes that will happen. They think they are indispensable members of the in group. The same goes for Gen x over 55 who functionally behave and vote exactly like baby boomers. It never would ever ever cross their minds that dear leader would turn on them. He's their friend. It's a weird para social relationship they've got going. Like what they do with Joe Rogan.

Comment I know, but I'm constantly getting told (Score 1) 109

That there are just all these jobs that can't be automated so I don't have to worry about automation and job losses. The point I am making is that for the few jobs that can't be automated modern internet is fast enough and reliable enough to literally offshore them with remote operators. In countries where people make slave labor wages and the alternative is starvation.

On a project I had a couple of Filipinos take my job. If you're in White collar work long enough it's going to happen. They couldn't really do it but the company in question didn't particularly care. I moved on to another role. But I remember one of them telling me that doing the work was better than their alternatives and they implied that their alternatives were prostitution since they were a girl...

How the fuck am I supposed to compete with that in the job market? Karl Marx predicted Capital would flow to wherever labor is cheapest but all anyone can ever remember about him is a couple of tin pot dictators borrowed his books for rhetoric and speeches

Comment I think remote piloting is the bigger worry (Score 1) 109

You are correct that robotics is a huge job killer. Amazon has 1 million robots in their warehouses you don't deploy that many of something unless it's devouring jobs.

But I also don't think we talk enough about how modern high-speed internet makes it possible to pilot vehicles remotely overseas. Waymo has been caught doing that. When they are actually under oath like they were to Congress they admit that when the cars are in even slightly difficult situations a human driver takes over from a call center in the Philippines.

I don't even know where to begin with the legal problems with that. The reason they've been able to get away with that though is the same reason Uber has gotten away with what they do cars are a lot safer so you don't have people being killed all the time. Some people have been really fucked up don't get me wrong but so far it's just Uber drivers doing that. The remote pilot it waymos seem to be erring on the side of caution enough that it hasn't been a problem. I think they've only killed one homeless person and God knows nobody cares about that.

Still I would expect in the near future that big rigs and taxis are going to be controlled by people overseas making 50 cents an hour. That is just too juicy a cost saving. I don't think we'll have any choice in the matter the Epstein class will simply tell us this is how it is and we will suck it down like we always do. Americans sure is shit aren't going to actually protest and when we do like the new Kings protests going on right now you don't hear about it anymore because our news media is billionaire owned

Comment Re:Bezos doing atomics (Score 2) 83

It was a humorous way to bring attention to the fact that a large corporation primarily concerned with profits is unlikely to be heavily focused on safety. He was not being literal and I think you know that.

A shitload of corporations who are losing money hand over fist on AI and are under pressure to make it profitable are building and reopening a shitload of nuclear power plants.

I think the phrase is "what could possibly go wrong?" Followed by a laugh track and a general order of evacuation lasting 10 years ala Fukushima.

And before you start trying to apologize for Fukushima I will remind you that the city in question was evacuated for 10 years, engineers warned the CEOs about the coming tsunami and earthquake and outlined expensive safety precautions that would have prevented the disaster and finally and perhaps most importantly the public blamed the engineers.

Slashdot Top Deals

There are three kinds of people: men, women, and unix.

Working...