Let's be clear: If the government wants you, they're gonna get you. The laws aren't there to uphold social norms, they're there to club you over the head and drag you off in a way that seems justifiable to the unwashed masses, should the authorities so choose to do so
So what do you want - for the government instead of using laws, lawyers and judges to use some sort of random voodoo guesswork? Get the bad laws changed!
Of course population density matters. The cost of "handling twice as many calls" ought to be small compared to the cost of covering large swaths of empty countryside that only generate a few calls a day. In the former case, the infrastructure can be paid for by all those extra calls and customers. In the latter case, you have to maintain tons of infrastructure that is being subsidized by customers from higher-density areas.
"ChrUbuntu?" The OS of the Elder Gods?
Body armour for all kids in USA hanging on every classroom wall and bulletproof lockable doors that cant be shot out please
They all think it. Thinking it isn't the issue. The issue is whether it's a useful model to try and replicate in software. I think it is, but I didn't see much of anything like that in the AI/NLP classes I took.
I suspect part of the problem is, it's hard to come up with a test question that involves a neural net with more than three perceptrons.
You and the GP seem to have very different definitions of "phone".
More theoretically tractable, if nothing else.
If graphics hackers are so smart, why can't they get the bugs out of fresh paint?