I suppose we will have to agree to disagree on the subject of a film staying faithful to the game its based on. My mainpoint would be if you are not going to make a film like the game then why make a game adaptation at all. I mean Resident Evil was a decent action film but was nothing like the games at all. So why did they bother making it Resident Evil at all? Why not just make a complete different film that is standalone? The answer unfortunately is because they no if they attach the name Resident Evil to the film then they earn more money. Holloywood execs dont care about the average fan. I was really pissed off with Resident Evil because I wanted the film to have the games atmosphere. I think the main reason for game adaptations being poor films isnt because the people behind them try to keep the fans happy or because they stay faithful to the game. They are poor films because Hollywood knows it can make the worst film ever and still make a big profit because of the fans that will want to see the film anyway. Thats what really annoys me.