Comment Re:Doing what? (Score 2) 22
People should spend their energy learning how the tools work, and how to use them well.
People should spend their energy learning how the tools work, and how to use them well.
This may come across as tongue in cheek but I am deadpan serious.
My only complaint is that they will not shut up and take my money
Well, when you're filling the 50-gallon fuel tank in your 7 mpg truck, those per-gallon prices all get whacked with a nasty multiplier. That 20-cent difference costs you an additional $10.
But, all the more reason I love paying $0.05 per kWh for my "fuel".
As a general rule, when the British pronounce something different than the Americans, the American English pronunciation is closer to the original pronunciation. Either the British would Anglicize a foreign word that Americans would attempt to pronounce in its original form (e.g., "jaguar"), or the British English dialect drifted further from its original form (for example, when they forgot what the letter "R" meant).
The same happens in Spanish. Many of the Latin America dialects are far closer to how a Spaniard of, say, 1700 sounded than how a Spaniard of today sounds. I understand this is a pretty common phenomenon; colonies tend to preserve the language more carefully, while people in the original country feel more free to let it evolve. Its surprising how well this holds up even when the colonies are subject to more immigration and contact with other languages.
It's not universal, of course. People are complicated.
More recently I've been writing a lot more Python than C/C++/Java that I'd have been writing previously, so fewer semicolons is to be expected...
If you'd like to find a middle ground between the two, try Rust.
That you completely missed both his error and the joke, yet still felt the need to make a snide comment, is even funnier!
What illiterate morons modded your comment insightful?
Er... you missed the error and the joke. Note the "colleague".
Exactly and we should really PEG the money supply to installed generating capacity as well. That way it can easily expand (or shrink) with the economy and not be so easily tampered with.
Apple sent $600 and the design for the phone. Not just $600. "IP doesn't really enter into it" is the same thing they are saying in the post you are replying to. They are saying if it did, there wouldn't be much of a trade deficit.
Their argument is that the full retail value of the iPhone is counted as part of the US/China trade deficit. I don't think that's correct.
The imported item, the $1,000 iPhone, is counted in our trade deficit as the full $1,000 going to China.
I don't think that's correct. When you buy that phone you pay Apple, not Foxconn, and Applet doesn't send the full amount to China.
Do you have a citation for your assertion that the full retail price is considered as the imported amount?
TIL: English used to have "plumming" to indicate water pipes.
Then some eggheads at Oxford decided that the Latin had a 'b' so English should have a 'b' and only low-brow morons didn't know that so the OED was changed.
So today we still have 'plumbing' because of some dipshits in the 17th Century.
"Trust the Experts".
Your mode of life will be changed to ASCII.