So why tf are most comments about Trump? What on Earth does this have to do with US politics? The transplant didn't even take place in US but in China.

On topic, this is promising, but for a patient, 'the organ was rejected after X days' is just as bad as 'the organ was immediately rejected', the end result is you still die.

The managers, certainly the ones using this jargon a lot, will all be marketing people. Marketing is basically all about using various things including language to make your product seem as impressive as it can be, most likely to make it seem more impressive than it is in reality. This is basically same marketing, but used to sell themselves, to try and give themselves a superficial appearance of being hypercompetent and super professional. Basically 'I'm using a lot of big words, that means I'm smart'. After all, these people make orders of magnitude more than the peons who actually make the product, so they must be orders of magnitude more competent, right? This is signalling their supposed competence and professionalism.

Not that it's fooling any of the ground-level staff, hence the low morale. It just makes these people sound like the manager from 'Office Space'. But peons are not the ones the managers need to impress, they need to impress their superiors. And those will often be the same kind of MBAs who do the same performative BS, so it works.

First Zuckerberg wanted people to have AI friends, now these asshats want people to disconnect their brain and outsource their actual thinking process to AI. I can't even remember any Sci-Fi that imagines that kind of dystopia. The sad thing is, some people will be tempted.

Yeah, so:

So what these things do is, they listen to a conversation, process questions as voice commands, pass those down to the smartphone, the phone passes the question to ChatGPT or whatever LLM they use, then passes the ChatGPT answer to the glasses and they show it on the 'display' as semi-transparent text on the actual glasses I'm guessing, at least that's my understanding of it, unless I'm missing something.

First, smartphones already do all of this, including listening to all your conversations. The only new thing is, showing the AI response text superimposed on whatever you're seeing. With something like Siri however, you can let it know that something is a voice command and needs to be processed as such, and everything else is background noise. With these things, I don't see a way of doing this. So does it mean it will pass everything you hear to ChatGPT?

So you're at work or walking home and someone tells you "How's it going?", or possibly "Fuck you asshole" if they know you're wearing these glasses, and you're immediately seeing text of whatever you get when you put that into ChatGPT? Or at work someone tells you "We're shipping these in from China" and you immediately see a wall of text with helpful ChatGPT response on history and geography of China?

Then what happens if you're at a party and there's several people talking at once? Would you be seeing rapidly changing text? That would be incredibly distracting. So, far from making you seem "super-intelligent", best case scenario, these things would make you seem as intelligent as ChatGPT. Which is not that intelligent. Worst case scenario, these things will be so distracting it'll make you seem brain-damaged or high on some very powerful drugs. Seems like a classic case of a solution in search of a problem.

Surely olympic swimming pools would be a more appropriate unit of measure here?

Exactly. This is not a robot that can "grow" by "consuming" other machines. That would be a giant killer mecha that can disassemble an enemy tank and somehow process it into an extra layer of armour for itself. What this is, is a demonstration of assembly of a robot from spare parts, or a demo of small robots attaching themselves to other small robots in a kind of cool way. Not sure if this is sensationalist reporting, or the research team getting the military to fund their experiments by fooling them into believing this has some kind of defense utility (it has absolutely none).

My mistake about Abba, they're all alive, but there was a concert with their avatars as they were in the 1970's.

It's already been happening for a while. We had digitally recreated dead actors, digitally recreated dead musicians doing concerts (I think it was Abba? but there were probably others). In case that seemed harmless, there was also a 'comedy skit' done using George Carlin's voice a while ago. There was also an AI video of a bunch of celebrities including Scarlett Jonahson appearing to speak in support of Israel.

List of countries that currently block Wikipedia: China, Russia, Turkey, Venezuela. By pretty much forcing Wikipedia to not serve British users, and thus effectively blocking it, UK can join this list. I hope Labour is proud to stand alongside these countries. Fuck me, what a time to be alive.

That's not the purpose of the clothes ads. The purspose isn't to show a woman watching the ads how the clothes would actually fit her, the purpose is to let her imagine that wearing those clothes she can look just like the model who is wearing those clothes in the ad.

William Shatner in Star Trek is the first thing that comes to mind.

I actually agree completely. Had AI been used to solve certain specific engineering, medical and scientific problems it would've been a very useful tool to be used alongside human insight and understanding. Unfortunately current LLM 'AI' is specifically designed to give ready-made answers to any user questions. You ask ChatGPT "how do I do X?" and it straight up tells you the entire solution. That's by definition something designed to replace human thinking rather than augment it.

There's already a major problem that many young people today don't know how things work 'under the hood'. For example from what I've heard many young people just don't understand the basic concepts of an operating system, like files and directories, because they're used to just clicking on apps and letting them do their magic. You really don't want to make things any worse, but a tool that promises to magically answer any questions you ask it is guaranteed to make things so much worse.

What is meant by 'productivity' exactly? Take software development. There are 'software developers' today who copy-paste most of their code from internet and produce barely-working shit crawling with bugs. In that case, LLMs would save time on multiple google searches and forum questions and theoretically replace them with just one prompt. Unless AI produces something that doesn't compile because it hallucinated a bunch of fictitious headers and libraries. So now you can produce shit buggy code much faster. Is that the kind of productivity we want?

For people who at least to some extent know what they're doing, I'm not sure AI would be any help. I've always found doing code reviews difficult. You need to understand the approach the other person used, tune yourself to their way of thinking and see if there is anything they've missed. I've always found it easier when I'm asked to just solve a problem in my own way. In that case, working with AI would be like code-reviewing someone who doesn't understand what they're doing and just copied all the code from internet (because that is literally what LLMs are doing, with a sprinkling of hallucinations). That would definitely not help productivity.

In case someone thinks I'm referring to some super obscure OS for uber-geeks, I meant MacOS, or OSX. I kan't spel toadai.

Surely you've heard of Firefox? It's a web browser, articles on Firefox are regularly posted on slashdot. uMatrix is an adblocker - see this, there's a number of other adblockers out there. Here's more on i3 and xorg if you're intreseted, but basically it's Linux stuff. There's MaxOS as well, though I'm not a fan personally, the point is, there are alternatives to the Windows shit out there.

Time to go on a hamburger and chocolate diet, guaranteed bankruptcy protection.