"Microsoft worked with other organizations, including Cloudflare, Coinbase, OpenAI, Railway, SpyCloud, Shadowserver Foundation, and TRM Labs to Health-ISAC"

Under what authority did these private organizations seize domains? I am not sure how I feel about corporations acting as law enforcement. No wait, actually I am very sure how I feel about that.

Ok I read the Article, The blurb really should have mentioned "The action, carried out with authorization from the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia"

"will result in disciplinary action, up to and including termination"

NO it is a violation of the law for them to use it like this, The punishment must include jail time and be out of the departments hands.

Do they not have the names of the officers who VIOLATED THE LAW and gave these bs reasons?
And if they have the names, why are they not being prosecuted?

Kinda hard to pass the blame on this one when the departments are not holding their officers accountable

When I can get access to the same data from Flock as the police I will agree with you. But since there is no public access to it I would say it is solely for law enforcement use and thus requires a warrant to access.

Flock does not voluntarily give the police information, they sell it.

"If this forces a judge to think twice about feeding court cases into claude and then basing their judgement on the analysis, so much the better."
This literally does not happen. No court cases are being fed into Claude. So no it forces no one to think about the thing that is never done.

So they don't even try to hide the fact this article is a blatant ad?

That will depend on Microsoft. The SoC most likely has the dtsi files since it is basically the same a s the DGX spark, but the boards dts files will need to be supplied by the manufacture. Both are required to create the DTB blobs required for boot. I would be very surprised if Microsoft provided them. They will say WSL is enough.

I don't think the kid did anything at all.

https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhellottec.com%2Fproduct%2F...

Pretty sure it was this one.

https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhellottec.com%2Fproduct%2F...

I should have said unconstitutional.

As it stands there are other laws that deal specifically with flying that could very much make this illegal, and probably do.

"Ultimately, whether it is legal in the United States to falsely shout "fire" in a theater depends on the circumstances in which it is done and the consequences of doing it. The act of shouting "fire" when there are no reasonable grounds for believing one exists is not in itself a crime, and nor would it be rendered a crime merely by having been carried out inside a theatre, crowded or otherwise. "

If you were trying to show that it is illegal, you made a poor choice.

What? Water still effects lasers at 1550nm. I guarantee this is a hybrid system that uses radio when weather conditions demand.

How does it codify anything? To codify something in law it would need to pass though Congress and be signed into law by a president. None of which happened for "Qualified Immunity". The Supreme Court has no authority to create anything by fiat.

You think surveillance pricing is about poor people paying less? Oh you naive fool.

"Similarly, some of the most famous generals were notorious for not being in their command center, and being found sitting in some foxhole talking to a corporal or sergeant."

Which is why most armies got the butts kicked by the Germans, and why the Germans got trounced by the US.
The more you need to direct the troops with orders, the less flexible they are.